1887

Abstract

An appraisal of the relationship of Severini 1913 and (McCulloch 1921) Stapp 1928 has been conducted on the basis of an examination of the properties of these species as described in the literature and of the properties of the “lectotype” strain of . . Examination of this strain (ATCC 10248), which was deposited in the ATCC by McCulloch under the name , indicates that the previous descriptions of . were incorrect in several instances, such as in capsule formation and fluorescence of the yellow pigment it produces. Because the corrected description of . is identical to the original description of . , the two names are regarded as synonyms, with . having priority. Strain ATCC 10248 (NCPPB 1891) is designated as the neotype strain of P. .

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-23-4-433
1973-10-01
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/23/4/ijs-23-4-433.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-23-4-433&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Ballard R. W., Palleroni N. J., Doudoroff M., Stanier R. Y., Mandel M. 1970; Taxonomy of the aerobic pseudomonads: Pseudomonas cepacia, P. marginata, P. alliicola, and P. caryophylli. J. Gen. Microbiol 60:199–214
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bergey D. H., Breed R. S., Murray E. G. D., Hitchens A. P. 1939 Bergey’s manual of determinative bacteriology, 5. The Williams & Wilkins Co; Baltimore:
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bergey D. H., Harrison F. C., Breed R. S., Hammer B. W., Huntoon F. M. 1930 Bergey’s manual of determinative bacteriology, 3. The Williams & Wilkins Co; Baltimore:
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Breed R. S., Murray E. G. D., Smith N. R. 1957 Bergey’s manual of determinative bacteriology, 7. The Williams & Wilkins Co; Baltimore:
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bryan M. K. 1927; Beef infusion versus beef extract media. Phytopathology 17:413–414
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Burkholder W. H. 1942; Three bacterial plant pathogens: Phytomonas caryophylli sp.n., Phyto-monas alliicola sp.n., and Phytomonas manihotis (Arthaud-Berthet et Bondar) Viegas. Phytopathology 32:141–149
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Elliott C. 1930 Manual of bacterial plant pathogens The Williams & Wilkins Co; Baltimore:
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Elliott C. 1951 Manual of bacterial plant pathogens, 2. Chronica Botanica; Waltham, Mass:
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hildebrand D. C. 1971; Pectate and pectin gels for differentiation of Pseudomonas sp. and other bacterial plant pathogens. Phytopathology 61:1430–1436
    [Google Scholar]
  10. King E. O., Ward M. K., Raney D. E. 1954; Two simple media for the demonstration of pyocyanin and fluorescein. J. Lab. Clin. Med 44:301–307
    [Google Scholar]
  11. McCulloch L. 1921; A bacterial disease of gladiolus. Science 54:115–116
    [Google Scholar]
  12. McCulloch L. 1924; A leaf and corm disease of gladioli caused by Bacterium narginatum. J. Agr. Res 29:159–177
    [Google Scholar]
  13. McCulloch L. 1947; Notes on a brown pigment and other unusual characters in cultures of Bacterium marginatum . Phytopathology 37:349–353
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Sands D. C., Schroth M. N., Hildebrand D. C. 1970; Taxonomy of phytopathogenic pseudomonads. J. Bacteriol 101:9–23
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Severini G. 1913; Una bacteriosi dell’Ixia macu-lata e del Gladiolus Colvilli. Ann. Bot. (Rome) 11:413–424
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Severini G. 1913; Inttorno alle attivita enzi-matiche di due bacteri patogeni per le piante. Ann. Bot. (Rome) 11:441–452
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Society of American Bacteriologists 1967 Manual of Microbiological Methods315 McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc; New York:
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Stapp C. 1928; Schizomycetes (Spaltpilze oder Bakterien). Sorauer Paul. Handb. PflKrankh. 5, Aufl 21 Berlin:
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Stapp C. 1956; Bakterielle Krankheiten. Sorauer Paul. Handb. PflKrankh. II, Aufl 62 Berlin:
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Starr M. P., Burkholder W. H. 1942; Lipolytic activity of phytopathogenic bacteria determined by means of spirit blue agar and its taxonomic significance. Phytopathology 32:598–604
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-23-4-433
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-23-4-433
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error