Electrophoretic Patterns of Proteins in the Genus Bifidobacterium and Proposal of Four New Species

References

1. Fox R. H., McClain D. E. 1974; Evaluation of the taxonomic relationship of Micrococcus cryophilus, Branhamella catarrhalis, and neisseriae by comparative poly-acrylamide gel electrophoresis of soluble proteins. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 24:172–176
   [Google Scholar]
2. Georg L. K., Robertstad G. W., Brinkman S. A., Hicklin M. D. 1965; A new pathogenic anaerobic Actinomyces species. J. Infect. Dis 115:88–99
   [Google Scholar]
3. Gherna R. L., Pienta P. 1980; Bifidobacterium bifidutn. 50 In American Type Culture Collection catalogue of strains 1, 14. American Type Culture Collection; Rockville, Md:
   [Google Scholar]
4. Gross C. S., Ferguson D. A. Jr., Cummins C. S. 1978; Electrophoretic protein patterns and enzyme mobilities in anaerobic coryneforms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 35:1102–1108
   [Google Scholar]
5. Holdeman L. V., Cato E. P., Moore W. E. C. 1977 Anaerobe laboratory manual, 4. Anaerobe Laboratory, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Blacksburg:
   [Google Scholar]
6. Holdeman L. V., Good I. J., Moore W. E. C. 1976; Human fecal flora: variation in bacterial composition within individuals and a possible effect of emotional stress. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 31:359–375
   [Google Scholar]
7. Holdeman L. V., Moore W. E. C. 1970 Outline of clinical methods in anaerobic bacteriology, 2. Anaerobe Laboratory, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Blacksburg:
   [Google Scholar]
8. Jarvis A. W., Wolff J. M. 1979; Grouping of lactic streptococci by gel electrophoresis of soluble cell extracts. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 37:391–398
   [Google Scholar]
9. Kersters K., De Ley J. 1975; Identification and grouping of bacteria by numerical analysis of their electrophoretic protein patterns. J. Gen. Microbiol 87:333–342
   [Google Scholar]
10. Matteuzzi D., Crociani F., Zani G., Trovatelli L. D. 1971; Bifidobacterium suis n. sp.: a new species of the genus Bifidobacterium isolated from pig feces. Z. Allg. Mikrobiol 11:387–395
    [Google Scholar]
11. Mays T. D., Holdeman L. V., Moore W. E. C., Rogosa M., Johnson J. L. 1982; Taxonomy of the genus Veillonella Prévot. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 32:28–36
    [Google Scholar]
12. Mitsuoka T. 1969; Vergleichende Untersuchungen über die Bifidobakterien aus dem Verdauungstrakt von Menschen und Tieren. Zentralbl. Bakteriol. Parasitenkd. Infektionskr. Hyg. Abt. 1 Orig 210:52–64
    [Google Scholar]
13. Mitsuoka T., Morishita Y., Terada A., Watanabe K. 1974; Actinomyces eriksonii Georg, Robertstad, Brinkman und Hicklin 1965 identisch mit Bifidobacterium adolescentis Reuter 1963. Zentralbl. Bakteriol. Parasitenkd. Infektionskr. Hyg. Abt. 1 Orig. Reihe A 226:257–263
    [Google Scholar]
14. Moore W. E. C., Cato E. P., Good I. J., Holdeman L. V. 1981; The effect of diet on the human fecal flora. 11–23 Bruce W. R. Cold Spring Harbor Banbury Report 7 Gastrointestinal cancer: endogenous factors. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory; Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y:
    [Google Scholar]
15. Moore W. E. C., Hash D. E., Holdeman L. V., Cato E. P. 1980; Polyacrylamide slab gel electrophoresis of soluble proteins for studies of bacterial floras. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 39:900–907
    [Google Scholar]
16. Moore W. E. C., Holdeman L. V. 1974; Human fecal flora: the normal flora of 20 Japanese-Hawaiians. Appl. Microbiol 27:961–979
    [Google Scholar]
17. Orla-Jensen S. 1924; La classification des bacteries lactiques. Lait 4:468–474
    [Google Scholar]
18. Pine L. 1970; Classification and phylogenetic relationship of microaerophilic actinomycetes. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 20:445–474
    [Google Scholar]
19. Pine L., Georg L. 1965; The classification and phylogenetic relationships of the Actinomycetales. Int. Bull. Bacteriol. Nomencl. Taxon 15:143–163
    [Google Scholar]
20. Pine L., Howell A. 1956; Comparison of physiological and biochemical characters of Actinomyces spp. with those of Lactobacillus bifidus. J. Gen. Microbiol 15:428–445
    [Google Scholar]
21. Reuter G. 1963-64; Vergleichende Untersuchungen über die Bifidus-Flora im Säuglings- und Erwachsenenstuhl. Zentralbl. Bakteriol. Parasitenkd. Infektionskr. Hyg. Abt. 1 Orig 191:486–507
    [Google Scholar]
22. Rogosa M. 1974; Genus III. Bifidobacterium Orla-Jensen 1924. 472669–676 Buchanan R. E., Gibbons N. E. Bergey’s manual of determinative bacteriology, 8. The Williams & Wilkins Co; Baltimore:
    [Google Scholar]
23. Scardovi V., Casalicchio F., Vincenzi N. 1979; Multiple electrophoretic forms of transaldolase and 6-phos-phogluconic dehydrogenase and their relationships to the taxonomy and ecology of the bifidobacteria. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 29:312–327
    [Google Scholar]
24. Scardovi V., Crociani F. 1974; Bifidobacterium catenulatum, Bifidobacterium dentium, Bifidobacterium angulatum: three new species and their deoxyribonucleic acid homology relationships. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 24:6–20
    [Google Scholar]
25. Scardovi V., Trovatelli L. D. 1969; New species of bifid bacteria from Apis mellifica L. and Apis indica F. A contribution to the taxonomy and biochemistry of the genus Bifidobacterium. Zentralbl. Bakteriol. Parasitenkd. Infektionskr. Hyg. Abt. 2 123:64–88
    [Google Scholar]
26. Scardovi V., Trovatelli L. D. 1974; Bifidobacterium animalis (Mitsuoka) comb. nov. and the “minimum” and “subtile” groups of new bifidobacteria found in sewage. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 24:21–28
    [Google Scholar]
27. Scardovi V., Trovatelli L. D., Biavati B., Zani G. 1979; Bifidobacterium cuniculi, Bifidobacterium choerinum, Bifidobacterium boum, Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum: four new species and their deoxyribonucleic acid homology relationships. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 29:291–311
    [Google Scholar]
28. Scardovi V., Trovatelli L. D., Crociani F., Sgorbati B. 1969; Bifid bacteria in bovine rumen. New species of the genus Bifidobacterium: B. globosum n. sp. and B. ruminale n. sp. Arch. Mikrobiol 68:278–294
    [Google Scholar]
29. Scardovi V., Trovatelli L. D., Zani G., Crociani F., Matteuzzi D. 1971; Deoxyribonucleic acid homology relationships among species of the genus Bifidobacterium. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 21:276–294
    [Google Scholar]
30. Scardovi V., Zani G. 1974; Bifidobacterium magnum sp. nov., a large, acidophilic bifidobacterium isolated from rabbit feces. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 24:29–34
    [Google Scholar]
31. Scardovi V., Zani G., Trovatelli L. D. 1970; Deoxyribonucleic acid homology among the species of the genus Bifidobacterium isolated from animals. Arch. Mikrobiol 72:318–325
    [Google Scholar]
32. Seiter J. A., Jay J. M. 1980; Application of polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis to the characterization and identification of Arthrobacter species. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 30:460–465
    [Google Scholar]
33. Skerman V. B. D., McGowan V., Sneath P. H. A. 1980; Approved lists of bacterial names. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 30:225–420
    [Google Scholar]
34. Slack J. M. 1974; Genus I. Actinomyces Harz 1877. 485660–667 Buchanan R. E., Gibbons N. E. Bergey’s manual of determinative bacteriology, 8. The Williams & Wilkins Co; Baltimore:
    [Google Scholar]
35. Strom A., Dyer J. K., Marsh C., Tribble J. L. 1976; Identification and characterization of species of the family Bacteroidaceae by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. J. Dent. Res 55:252–256
    [Google Scholar]
36. Tissier H. 1900 Recherches sur la flore intestinale des nourrissons Paris Theses:
    [Google Scholar]
37. Trovatelli L. D., Crociani F., Pedinotti M., Scardovi V. 1974; Bifidobacterium pullorum sp. nov.: a new species isolated from chicken feces and a related group of bifidobacteria isolated from rabbit feces. Arch. Microbiol 98:187–198
    [Google Scholar]
38. Zani G., Biavati B., Crociani F., Matteuzzi D. 1974; Bifidobacteria from the faeces of piglets. J. Appl. Bacteriol 37:537–547
    [Google Scholar]