1887

Abstract

Abstract

A comparative electrophoretic karyotyping study was performed with several certified authentic strains of the four species that could be distinguished by nuclear DNA (nDNA)-nDNA reassociation data within the sensu stricto group of the genus A multivariate analysis of the polymorphisms observed in pulsed-fleld gel electrophoretic profiles (numbers and molecular weights of separated units) revealed that the strains could be separated into four clusters that corresponded to the taxa that were distinguished on the basis of nDNA comparisons. Discrepancies between nDNA reassociation data and membership in the corresponding clusters were observed only with two strains of Blind tests carried out with additional industrial strains confirmed the general validity of the statistical model created for comparison of karyotypes within the species included in sensu stricto.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-44-4-791
1994-10-01
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/44/4/ijs-44-4-791.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-44-4-791&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bidenne C., Blondin B., Dequin S., Vezinhet F. 1992; Analysis of the chromosomal DNA polymorphism of wine strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr. Genet. 22:1–7
    [Google Scholar]
  2. De Jonge P., De Jongh F. C. M., Meyers R., Steensma H. Y., Scheffers W. A. 1986; Orthogonal-field-alternation gel electrophoresis banding patterns of DNA from yeasts. Yeast 2:193–204
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Delorme M. O., Hénaut A., Vigier P. 1988; Mutations in the NAM2 genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and S. douglasii are clustered nonrandomly as a result of constrains on the nucleic acid sequence and not on the protein. Mol. Gen. Genet. 213:310–314
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Dobzhansky T. 1976 Organismic and molecular aspects of species formation95–105 In Ayala F. (ed.) Molecular evolution. Sinauer Associates; Sunderland, Mass:
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Herbert C. J., Dujardin G., Labouesse M., Slonimski P. P. 1988; Divergence of the mitochondrial leucyl tRNA synthase genes in two closely related yeasts, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces douglasii: a paradigm of incipient evolution. Mol. Gen. Genet. 213:297–309
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Holmberg S. 1982; Genetic differences between Saccharomyces carlsbergensis and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Restriction endonuclease analysis of genes in chromosome III. Carlsberg Res. Commun. 47:233–244
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Johnston J. R., Contopoulou C. R., Mortimer R. K. 1988; Karyotyping of yeast strains of several genera by field inversion gel electrophoresis. Yeast 4:191–198
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Johnston J. R., Mortimer R. K. 1986; Electrophoretic karyotyping of laboratory and commercial strains of Saccharomyces and other yeasts. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 36:569–572
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Kaneko Y., Banno I. 1991; Reexamination of Saccharomyces bayanus strains by DNA-DNA hybridization and electrophoretic karyotyping. Institute for Fermentation (Osaka) Res. Commun. 15:30–41
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Kaneko Y., Mikata K., Banno I. 1989; Karyotyping of Saccharomyces exiguus by pulsed-field electrophoresis. Institute for Fermentation (Osaka) Res. Commun. 14:111–117
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Kunze G., Kunze I., Barner A., Schulz R. 1993; Classification of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains by genetical and biochemical methods. Monatsschr. Brauwiss. 46:132–136
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Longo E., Vezineht F. 1993; Chromosomal rearrangement during vegetative growth of a wild strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59:322–326
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Martini A. 1993; Origin and domestication of the wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Wine Res. 4:165–176
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Merz W. G., Connelly C., Hieter P. 1988; Variation of electrophoretic karyotypes among clinical isolates of Candida albicans. J. Clin. Microbiol. 26:842–845
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Miller M., Kock J. L. F., Pretorius G. H. J., Coetzee D. J. 1989; The value of orthogonal-field-alternation gel electrophoresis and other criteria in the taxonomy of the genus Pichia Hansen emend. Kurtzman. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 12:191–202
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Mitchell R., Bleakly D., Cabin R., Chan R., Enquist B., Marshall D., Reed S., Stevens G., Waser N. 1993; Species concepts. Nature (London) 364:20
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Monia B. P., Haskell K. M., Ecker J. R., Ecker D. J., Crooke S. T. 1989; Chromosomal mapping of the ubiquitin gene family in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by pulsed field gel electrophoresis. Nucleic Acids Res. 17:3611
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Mortimer R. K., Contopoulou C. R., King J. S. 1992; Genetic and physical maps of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, edition 11. Yeast 8:817–902
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Naumov G. 1986; Genetic differentiation and ecology of the yeast Saccharomyces paradoxus. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 289:213–216
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Naumov G., Naumova E. S., Lantto R. A., Louis E. J., Korhola M. 1992; Genetic homology between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its sibling species S. paradoxus and S. bayanus: electrophoretic karyotypes. Yeast 8:599–612
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Nillson-Tillgren T., Gjermansen C., Holmberg S., Petersen J. G. L., Kielland-Brandt M. C. 1986; Analysis of chromosome V and the ILV1 gene from Saccharomyces carlsbergensis. Carlsberg Res. Commun. 51:309–326
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Pedersen M. B. 1986; DNA sequence polymorphism in the genus Saccharomyces. IV. Homologous chromosome III of Saccharomyces bay anus, S. carlsbergensis, and S. warum. Carlsberg Res. Commun. 51:185–202
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Price C. W., Fuson G. B., Phaff H. J. 1978; Genome comparison in yeast systematics: delimitation of species within the genera Schwanniomyces, Saccharomyces, Debaryomyces, and Pichia. Microbiol. Rev. 42:161–193
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Roman H. 1981; Development of yeast as an experimental organism. 1–9 In Strathern J. N., Jones E. W., Broach J. R. (ed.) The molecular biology of the yeast Saccharomyces-1977 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory; Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.:
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Rosini G., Federici F., Vaughan A. E., Martini A. 1982; Systematics of the species of the yeast genus Saccharomyces associated with the fermentation industry. Eur. J. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 15:188–193
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Rustchenko-Bulgac E. P. 1991; Variations of Candida albicans electrophoretic karyotypes. J. Bacteriol. 173:6586–6596
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Sheehan C. A., Weiss A. S., Newson I. A., Flint V., O’Donnel D. C. 1991; Brewing yeast identification and chromosome analysis using high resolution chef gel electrophoresis. J. Inst. Brew. 97:163–167
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Slater G. W., Turmel C., Lalande M., Noolandi J. 1989; DNA gel electrophoresis: effect of field intensity and agarose concentration on band inversion. Biopolymers 28:1793–1799
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Smith C. L., Cantor C. R. 1987; Preparation and manipulation of large DNA molecules: advances and applications. Trends Biochem. Sci. 12:284–287
    [Google Scholar]
  30. van der Walt J. P. 1970; Saccharomyces Meyen emend. Reess. 555–718 In Lodder J. (ed.) The yeasts. A taxonomic study North-Holland Publishing Co.; Amsterdam:
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Vaughan Martini A. 1989; Saccharomyces paradoxus comb, nov., a newly separated species of the Saccharomyces sensu stricto complex based upon nDNA/nDNA homologies. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 12:179–182
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Vaughan Martini A., Kurtzman C. P. 1985; Deoxyribonucleic acid relatedness among species of the genus Saccharomyces sensu stricto. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 35:508–511
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Vaughan Martini A., Martini A. 1987; Three newly delimited species of Saccharomyces sensu stricto. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 53:77–84
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Vaughan Martini A., Martini A. 1993; A taxonomic key for the genus Saccharomyces. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 16:113–119
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Vaughan Martini A., Martini A., Cardinali G. 1993; Electrophoretic karyotyping as a taxonomic tool in the genus Saccharomyces. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 63:145–156
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Vollrath D., Davis R. W., Connelly C., Hieter P. 1988; Physical mapping of large DNA by chromosome fragmentation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:6027–6031
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Wold S., Sjostrom M. 1977; SIMCA: a method for analysing chemical data in terms of similarity and analogy. ACS (Am. Chem. Soc.) Symp. Ser. 52:243–282
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Yarrow D. 1984; Saccharomyces Meyen ex Reess. 379–395 In Rij N. J. W. Kreger-van. (ed.) The yeasts: a taxonomic study, 3rd ed.. Elsevier Science Publishers; Amsterdam:
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-44-4-791
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-44-4-791
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error