Classification of Lactobacillus plantarum by Restriction Endonuclease Analysis of Total Chromosomal DNA Using Conventional Agarose Gel Electrophoresis

References

1. Bauer W., Vinograd J. 1968; The interaction of closed circular DNA with intercalative dyes. I. The superhelix density of SV 40 DNA in the presence and absence of dye. J. Mol. Biol 33:141–171
   [Google Scholar]
2. Collins M. D., Rodrigues U., Ash C., Aguirre M., Farrow J. A. E., Martinez-Murcia A., Phillips B. A., Williams A. M., Wallbanks S. 1991; Phylogenetic analysis of the genus Lactobacillus and related lactic acid bacteria as determined by reverse transcriptase sequencing of 16S rRNA. FEMS Microbiol. Lett 77:5–12
   [Google Scholar]
3. Dellaglio F., Bottazi V., Vescovo M. 1975; Deoxyribonucleic acid ho-mology among Lactobacillus species of the subgenus Streptobacterium Orla Jensen. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 25:160–172
   [Google Scholar]
4. Efthymiu C., Hansen P. A. 1962; An antigenic analysis of Lactobacillus acidophilus. J. Infect. Dis 110:258–267
   [Google Scholar]
5. Johansson M.-L., Molin G., Jeppsson B., Nobaek S., Ahrné S., Bengmark S. 1993; Administration of different Lactobacillus strains in fermented oatmeal soup: in vivo colonization of human intestinal mucosa and effect on the indigenous flora. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 59:15–20
   [Google Scholar]
6. Johansson M.-L., Molin G., Pettersson B., Uhlén M., Ahrné S. Characterization and species recognition of Lactobacillus plantarum strains by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) of the 16S rRNA gene. J. Appl. Bacteriol., in press;
   [Google Scholar]
7. Johansson M.-L., Quednau M., Molin G., Ahrné S. Randomly amplified polymorphic DNA for rapid typing of Lactobacillus plantarum strains. Lett. Appl. Microbiol., in press;
   [Google Scholar]
8. Johansson M.-L., Sanni A. I., Lönner C., Molin G. 1995; Phenotypically based taxonomy using API 50CH, of lactobacilli from Nigerian ogi, and the occurrence of starch fermenting strains. Int. J. Food Microbiol 25:159–168
   [Google Scholar]
9. McKay L. L., Baldwin K. A. 1990; Applications for biotechnology: present and future improvements in lactic acid bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev 87:3–14
   [Google Scholar]
10. Molin G., Jeppsson B., Johansson M.-L., Ahrné S., Nobaek S., Ståhl M., Bengmark S. 1993; Numerical taxonomy of Lactobacillus spp. associated with healthy and diseased mucosa of the human intestines. J. Appl. Bacteriol 74:314–323
    [Google Scholar]
11. Romersburg H. C. 1984 Cluster analysis for research Lifetime Learning Publications; Belmont, Calif:
    [Google Scholar]
12. Schleifer K. H., Ludwig W., Amann R., Hertel C., Ehrmann M., Köhler W., Krause A. 1992; Phylogenetic relationships of lactic acid bacteria and their identification with nucleic acid probes. 23–32 Les Bacteries Lactiques. Adria Normandie Centre de Publications de PUniversite de Caen; Caen, France:
    [Google Scholar]
13. Ståhl M., Molin G. 1994; Classification of Lactobacillus reuteri by restriction endonuclease analysis of chromosomal DNA. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 44:9–14
    [Google Scholar]
14. Ståhl M., Molin G., Persson A., Ahrne S., Ståhl S. 1990; Restriction endonuclease patterns and multivariate analysis as a classification tool for Lactobacillus spp. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 40:189–193
    [Google Scholar]
15. Wold A. (Department of Clinical Immunology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden); 1995 Personal communication
    [Google Scholar]
16. Zanoni P., Farrow J. A. E., Phillips B. A., Collins M. D. 1987; Lactobacillus pentosus (Fred, Peterson, and Anderson) sp. nov., nom. rev. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 37:339–341
    [Google Scholar]