1887

Abstract

DSM 17424 was compared with CC-FR2-10 to clarify the taxonomic relationship between the two species. 16S rRNA gene sequence comparisons demonstrated that these strains share 99.5 % sequence similarity. Investigation of fatty acid patterns and substrate utilization profiles displayed no striking differences between the type strains of the two species. DNA–DNA hybridizations between the two strains showed 75.4 % (76.6 %) relatedness. Therefore, the reclassification of as a later heterotypic synonym of is proposed, based upon the estimated phylogenetic position derived from 16S rRNA gene sequence data, fatty acid and biochemical data and DNA–DNA hybridization results.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijs.0.002824-0
2009-02-01
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/59/2/365.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijs.0.002824-0&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Kämpfer, P. & Kroppenstedt, R. M.(1996). Numerical analysis of fatty acid patterns of coryneform bacteria and related taxa. Can J Microbiol 42, 989–1005.[CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Kämpfer, P., Steiof, M. & Dott, W.(1991). Microbiological characterization of a fuel-oil contaminated site including numerical identification of heterotrophic water and soil bacteria. Microb Ecol 21, 227–251.[CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Lai, W. A., Kämpfer, P., Arun, A. B., Shen, F.-T., Huber, B., Rekha, P. D. & Young, C. C.(2006).Deinococcus ficus sp. nov., isolated from the rhizosphere of Ficus religiosa L. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56, 787–791.[CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lapage, S. P., Sneath, P. H. A., Lessel, E. F., Skerman, V. B. D., Seeliger, H. P. R. & Clark, W. A. (editors)(1992).International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria (1990 Revision). Bacteriological Code. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology.
  5. Rainey, F. A., Ray, K., Ferreira, M., Gatz, B. Z., Nobre, M. F., Bagaley, D., Rash, B. A., Park, M. J., Earl, A. M. & other authors(2005). Extensive diversity of ionizing-radiation-resistant bacteria recovered from Sonoran Desert soil and description of nine new species of the genus Deinococcus obtained from a single soil sample. Appl Environ Microbiol 71, 5225–5235.[CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Shashidhar, R. & Bandekar, J.(2006a).Deinococcus mumbaiensis sp. nov., a radiation-resistant pleomorphic bacterium isolated from Mumbai, India. FEMS Microbiol Lett 254, 275–280.[CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Shashidhar, R. & Bandekar, J.(2006b).Deinococcus mumbaiensis sp. nov. In List of New Names and New Combinations Previously Effectively, but not Validly, Published. Validation List no. 109. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56, 925–927.[CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ziemke, F., Höfle, M. G., Lalucat, J. & Rosselló-Mora, R.(1998). Reclassification of Shewanella putrefaciens Owen's genomic group II as Shewanella baltica sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 48, 179–186.[CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijs.0.002824-0
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijs.0.002824-0
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error