1887

Abstract

The genus comprises 17 species, some of which are important animal and human pathogens. To gain more insight into the genetic relatedness of this genus and to improve the molecular tools available for diagnosis, a universal sequencing approach was established for the gene encoding the beta-subunit of RNA polymerase () for the genus . A total of 59 strains, including the type strains of currently recognized species as well as field isolates, were investigated in the study. A primer set specific for species enabled straightforward amplification and sequencing of a 530 bp fragment of the gene. The 16S rRNA gene sequences of all of the strains were determined in parallel. A good congruence was obtained between 16S rRNA and gene sequence-based trees within the genus . The branching of the tree was similar to that of the 16S rRNA gene tree, even though a few discrepancies were observed for certain species. The resolution of the gene within the genus was generally much higher than that of the 16S rRNA gene sequence, resulting in a clear separation of most species and even some subspecies. The universally applicable amplification and sequencing approach for partial gene sequence determination provides a powerful tool for DNA sequence-based discrimination of species.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijs.0.64109-0
2006-05-01
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/56/5/937.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijs.0.64109-0&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Acinas S. G., Marcelino L. A., Klepac-Ceraj V., Polz M. F. 2004; Divergence and redundancy of 16S rRNA sequences in genomes with multiple rrn operons. J Bacteriol 186:2629–2635 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Angen O., Ahrens P., Kuhnert P., Christensen H., Mutters R. 2003; Proposal of Histophilus somni gen nov., sp. nov for the three species incertae sedis ‘ Haemophilus somnus ’, ‘ Haemophilus agni ’ and ‘ Histophilus ovis ’. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 531449–1456 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bourke B., Chan V. L., Sherman P. 1998; Campylobacter upsaliensis : waiting in the wings. Clin Microbiol Rev 11:440–449
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Christensen H., Kuhnert P., Olsen J. E., Bisgaard M. 2004; Comparative phylogenies of the housekeeping genes atpD , infB and rpoB and the 16S rRNA gene within the Pasteurellaceae . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54:1601–1609 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cloak O. M., Fratamico P. M. 2002; A multiplex polymerase chain reaction for the differentiation of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli from a swine processing facility and characterization of isolates by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and antibiotic resistance profiles. J Food Prot 65:266–273
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Dedieu L., Pages J. M., Bolla J. M. 2004; Use of the omp50 gene for identification of Campylobacter species by PCR. J Clin Microbiol 42:2301–2305 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Dingle K. E., Colles F. M., Falush D., Maiden M. C. J. 2005; Sequence typing and comparison of population biology of Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter jejuni . J Clin Microbiol 43:340–347 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Drancourt M., Roux V., Fournier P. E., Raoult D. 2004; rpoB gene sequence-based identification of aerobic Gram-positive cocci of the genera Streptococcus ,Enterococcus , Gemella , Abiotrophia , and Granulicatella . J Clin Microbiol 42:497–504 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Duim B., Wagenaar J. A., Dijkstra J. R., Goris J., Endtz H. P., Vandamme P. 2004; Identification of distinct Campylobacter lari genogroups by amplified fragment length polymorphism and protein electrophoretic profiles. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:18–24 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Etoh Y., Yamamoto A., Goto N. 1998; Intervening sequences in 16S rRNA genes of Campylobacter sp.: diversity of nucleotide sequences and uniformity of location. Microbiol Immunol 42:241–243 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Foster G., Holmes B., Steigerwalt A. G. 7 other authors 2004; Campylobacter insulaenigrae sp. nov., isolated from marine mammals. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54:2369–2373 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Gorkiewicz G., Feierl G., Schober C., Dieber F., Kofer J., Zechner R., Zechner E. L. 2003; Species-specific identification of campylobacters by partial 16S rRNA gene sequencing. J Clin Microbiol 41:2537–2546 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Harrington C. S., On S. L. 1999; Extensive 16S rRNA gene sequence diversity in Campylobacter hyointestinalis strains: taxonomic and applied implications. Int J Syst Bacteriol 49:1171–1175 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hum S., Quinn K., Brunner J., On S. L. 1997; Evaluation of a PCR assay for identification and differentiation of Campylobacter fetus subspecies. Aust Vet J 75:827–831 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kärenlampi R. I., Tolvanen T. P., Hanninen M. L. 2004; Phylogenetic analysis and PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism identification of Campylobacter species based on partial groEL gene sequences. J Clin Microbiol 42:5731–5738 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Kim K. S., Ko K. S., Chang M. W., Hahn T. W., Hong S. K., Kook Y. H. 2003; Use of rpoB sequences for phylogenetic study of Mycoplasma species. FEMS Microbiol Lett 226:299–305 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Ko K. S., Lee H. K., Park M. Y., Lee K. H., Yun Y. J., Woo S. Y., Miyamoto H., Kook Y. H. 2002; Application of RNA polymerase beta-subunit gene ( rpoB ) sequences for the molecular differentiation of Legionella species. J Clin Microbiol 40:2653–2658 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Korczak B., Christensen H., Emler S., Frey J., Kuhnert P. 2004; Phylogeny of the family Pasteurellaceae based on rpoB sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54:1393–1399 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Kuhnert P., Frey J., Lang N. P., Mayfield L. 2002; Phylogenetic analysis of Prevotella nigrescens , Prevotella intermedia and Porphyromonas gingivalis clinical strains reveals a clear species clustering. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52:1391–1395 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kuhnert P., Korczak B., Falsen E., Straub R., Hoops A., Boerlin P., Frey J., Mutters R. 2004; Nicoletella semolina gen. nov., sp. nov. a new member of Pasteurellaceae isolated from horses with airway disease. J Clin Microbiol 42:5542–5548 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kuwabara S. 2004; Guillain-Barré syndrome: epidemiology, pathophysiology and management. Drugs 64:597–610 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Linton D., Dewhirst F. E., Clewley J. P., Owen R. J., Burnens A. P., Stanley J. 1994; Two types of 16S rRNA gene are found in Campylobacter helveticus : analysis, applications and characterization of the intervening sequence found in some strains. Microbiology 140:847–855 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Miller W. G., On S. L. W., Wang G., Fontanoz S., Lastovica A. J., Mandrell R. E. 2005; Extended multilocus sequence typing system for Campylobacter coli , C. lari , C. upsaliensis , and C. helveticus . J Clin Microbiol 43:2315–2329 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Mollet C., Drancourt M., Raoult D. 1997; rpoB sequence analysis as a novel basis for bacterial identification. Mol Microbiol 26:1005–1011 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Moore J. E., Madden R. H. 2003; Comparison of eight phenotypic methods for subspecies characterization of thermophilic Campylobacter spp. isolated from pig liver. J Food Prot 66:1079–1084
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Morris G. K., el Sherbeeny M. R., Patton C. M., Kodaka H., Lombard G. L., Edmonds P., Hollis D. G., Brenner D. J. 1985; Comparison of four hippurate hydrolysis methods for identification of thermophilic Campylobacter spp. J Clin Microbiol 22:714–718
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Nayak R., Stewart T. M., Nawaz M. S. 2005; PCR identification of Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter jejuni by partial sequencing of virulence genes. Mol Cell Probes 19:187–193 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Nicholson M. A., Patton C. M. 1995; Evaluation of disk method for hippurate hydrolysis by Campylobacter species. J Clin Microbiol 33:1341–1343
    [Google Scholar]
  29. On S. L. 1996; Identification methods for campylobacters, helicobacters, and related organisms. Clin Microbiol Rev 9:405–422
    [Google Scholar]
  30. On S. L. 2001; Taxonomy of Campylobacter , Arcobacter , Helicobacter and related bacteria: current status, future prospects and immediate concerns. Symp Ser Soc Appl Microbiol 30:1S–15S
    [Google Scholar]
  31. On S. L., Harrington C. S. 2000; Identification of taxonomic and epidemiological relationships among Campylobacter species by numerical analysis of AFLP profiles. FEMS Microbiol Lett 193:161–169 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. On S. L., Harrington C. S. 2001; Evaluation of numerical analysis of PFGE-DNA profiles for differentiating Campylobacter fetus subspecies by comparison with phenotypic, PCR and 16S rDNA sequencing methods. J Appl Microbiol 90:285–293 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. On S. L., Bloch B., Holmes B., Hoste B., Vandamme P. 1995; Campylobacter hyointestinalis subsp. lawsonii subsp. nov., isolated from the porcine stomach, and an emended description of Campylobacter hyointestinalis . Int J Syst Bacteriol 45:767–774 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. On S. L., Atabay H. I., Corry J. E., Harrington C. S., Vandamme P. 1998; Emended description of Campylobacter sputorum and revision of its infrasubspecific (biovar) divisions, including C. sputorum biovar paraureolyticus, a urease-producing variant from cattle and humans. Int J Syst Bacteriol 48:195–206 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Roop R. M., Smibert R. M., Johnson J. L., Krieg N. R. 1984; Differential characteristics of catalase-positive campylobacters correlated with DNA homology groups. Can J Microbiol 30:938–951 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Roop R. M., Smibert R. M., Johnson J. L., Krieg N. R. 1985; DNA homology studies of the catalase-negative campylobacters and “ Campylobacter fecalis ”, an emended description of Campylobacter sputorum , and proposal of the neotype strain of Campylobacter sputorum . Can J Microbiol 31:823–831 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Sebald M., Véron M. 1963; Teneur en bases de l'ADN et classification des vibrions. Ann Inst Pasteur 105:897–910 (in French
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Skirrow M. B. 1994; Diseases due to Campylobacter , Helicobacter and related bacteria. J Comp Pathol 111:113–149 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Stanley J., Burnens A. P., Linton D., On S. L., Costas M., Owen R. J. 1992; Campylobacter helveticus sp. nov. a new thermophilic species from domestic animals: characterization, and cloning of a species-specific DNA probe. J Gen Microbiol 138:2293–2303 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Uzoigwe C. 2005; Campylobacter infections of the pericardium and myocardium. Clin Microbiol Infect 11:253–255 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Van Camp G., Van De Peer Y., Nicolai S., Neefs J. M., Vandamme P., De Wachter R. 1993; Structure of 16S and 23S ribosomal RNA genes in Campylobacter species – phylogenetic analysis of the genus Campylobacter and presence of internal transcribed spacers. Syst Appl Microbiol 16:361–368 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Vandamme P., On S. L. 2001; Recommendations of the subcommittee on the taxonomy of Campylobacter and related bacteria. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 51:719–721
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Vandamme P., Falsen E., Rossau R., Hoste B., Segers P., Tytgat R., De Ley J. 1991; Revision of Campylobacter , Helicobacter , and Wolinella taxonomy: emendation of generic descriptions and proposal of Arcobacter gen. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 41:88–103 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Van Doorn L. J., Verschuuren-van Haperen A., van Belkum A., Endtz H. P., Vliegenthart J. S., Vandamme P., Quint W. G. V. 1998; Rapid identification of diverse Campylobacter lari strains isolated from mussels and oysters using a reverse hybridization line probe assay. J Appl Microbiol 84:545–550 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijs.0.64109-0
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijs.0.64109-0
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error