1887

Abstract

A Gram-stain-negative, strictly aerobic, non-motile, rod-shaped and yellow-pigmented bacterium, designated strain THG-DN5.5, was isolated from soil of a Rose of Sharon garden in Daejeon, South Korea. According to 16S rRNA gene sequence comparisons, strain THG-DN5.5 was found to be most closely related to CCBAU 05354 (97.7 % sequence similarity), GR10-1 (97.0 %), ‘’ ICM 1-15 (96.0 %), DSM 19437 (95.7 %) and RP-2 (95.6 %). The DNA–DNA relatedness between strain THG-DN5.5 and its phylogenetically closest neighbours was below 50.0 %. The DNA G+C content was 43.1 mol%. The major polar lipid of strain THG-DN5.5 was found to be phosphatidylethanolamine. The major fatty acids were identified as C, iso-C, iso-C G, and iso-C 3-OH. MK-7 was the only menaquinone present. These data supported the affiliation of strain THG-DN5.5 to the genus . Strain THG-DN5.5 was distinguished from related species of the genus by physiological and biochemical tests. In conclusion, strain THG-DN5.5 represents a novel species of the genus , for which the name sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is THG-DN5.5 (=KACC 18857=CCTCC AB 2016086).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.001595
2017-04-01
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/67/4/784.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.001595&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Kim BY, Weon HY, Yoo SH, Hong SB, Kwon SW et al. Niabella aurantiaca gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from a greenhouse soil in Korea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:538–541 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Siddiqi MZ, Im WT. Niabella aquatica sp. nov., isolated from lake water. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:2774–2779 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Yi KJ, Im WT, Kim DW, Liu QM, Kim SK. Niabella ginsenosidivorans sp. nov., isolated from compost. J Microbiol 2015; 53:762–766 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Glaeser SP, Galatis H, Martin K, Kämpfer P. Niabella hirudinis and Niabella drilacis sp. nov., isolated from the medicinal leech Hirudo verbana. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:3487–3493 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Dahal RH, Kim J. Niabella pedocola sp. nov., isolated from soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:2650–2656 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Wang H, Zhang YZ, Man CX, Chen WF, Sui XH et al. Niabella yanshanensis sp. nov., isolated from the soybean rhizosphere. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:2854–2856 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol 1991; 173:697–703[PubMed] [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Kim OS, Cho YJ, Lee K, Yoon SH, Kim M et al. Introducing EzTaxon-e: a prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene sequence database with phylotypes that represent uncultured species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:716–721 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. The clustal_x windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25:4876–4882[PubMed] [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hall TA. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl Acids Symp Ser 1999; 41:95–98
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Kimura M. The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1983 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M et al. mega5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 2011; 28:2731–2739 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Felsenstein J. Confidence limit on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Moore DD, Dowhan D. Preparation and analysis of DNA. In Ausubel FW, Brent R, Kingston RE, Moore DD, Seidman JG. et al (editors) Current Protocols in Molecular Biology New York: Wiley; 1995 pp 2–11
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Mesbah M, Premachandran U, Whitman WB. Precise measurement of the G+C content of deoxyribonucleic acid by high-performance liquid chromatography. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1989; 39:159–167 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Ezaki T, Hashimoto Y, Yabuuchi E. Fluorometric deoxyribonucleic acid–deoxyribonucleic acid hybridization in microdilution wells as an alternative to membrane filter hybridization in which radioisotopes are used to determine genetic relatedness among bacterial strains. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1989; 39:224–229 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Stabili L, Gravili C, Tredici SM, Piraino S, Talà A et al. Epibiotic Vibrio luminous bacteria isolated from some hydrozoa and bryozoa species. Microb Ecol 2008; 56:625–636 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Gillis M, de Ley J, de Cleene M. The determination of molecular weight of bacterial genome DNA from renaturation rates. Eur J Biochem 1970; 12:143–153[PubMed] [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Mcconaughy BL, Laird CD, Mccarthy BJ. Nucleic acid reassociation in formamide. Biochem 1969; 8:3289–3295 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Wayne LG, Brenner DJ, Colwell RR, Grimont PAD, Kandler O et al. International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology. Report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1987; 37:463–464 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Stackebrandt E, Goebel BM. Taxonomic note: a place for DNA–DNA reassociation and 16S rRNA sequence analysis in the present species definition in bacteriology. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1994; 44:846–849 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Minnikin DE, O’Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An intergrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods 1984; 2:233–241 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Ngo HT, Yin CS. Luteimonas terrae sp. nov., isolated from rhizosphere soil of Radix ophiopogonis. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:1920–1925 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Sasser M. Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids, MIDI Technical Note 101. Newark, DE: MIDI Inc; 1990
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Collins MD, Jones D. Distribution of isoprenoid quinone structural types in bacteria and their taxonomic implication. Microbiol Rev 1981; 45:316–354[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Tamaoka J, Katayama-Fujimura A, Kuraishi H. Analysis of bacterial menaquinone mixtures by high-performance liquid chromatography. J Appl Bacteriol 1983; 54:31–36 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Hiraishi A, Ueda Y, Ishihara J, Mori T. Comparative lipoquinone analysis of influent sewage and activated sludge by high-performance liquid chromatography and photodiode array detection. J Gen Appl Microbiol 1996; 42:457–469 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Fautz E, Reichenbach H. A simple test for flexirubin–type pigments. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1980; 8:87–91 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Ahn JH, Jo EH, Kim BY, Song J, Kwon SW et al. Niabella terrae sp. nov. isolated from greenhouse soil. J Microbiol 2013; 51:731–735 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Weon HY, Kim BY, Joa JH, Kwon SW, Kim WG et al. Niabella soli sp. nov., isolated from soil from Jeju Island, Korea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008; 58:467–469 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.001595
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.001595
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary File 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error