1887

Abstract

A novel bacterial strain, S66, was isolated from eelgrass collected on the coastline of Zealand, Denmark. Polyphasic analyses involving phenotypic, phylogenetic and genomic methods were used to characterize strain S66. The strain was Gram-reaction-negative, rod-shaped, aerobic, and displayed growth at 10–25 °C (optimum 20–25 °C) and at pH 7–9 (optimum pH 7.5). Furthermore, strain S66 grew on seaweed polysaccharides agar, agarose, porphyran, -carrageenan, alginate and laminarin as sole carbon sources. Major fatty acids were C, Cω7 and Cω7. The respiratory quinone was determined to be Q-8, and major polar lipids were phosphatidylethanolamine and phosphatidylglycerol. The DNA G+C content was determined to be 42.2 mol%. Phylogenetic analyses based on the 16S rRNA gene and GyrB sequence comparisons showed that the bacterium was affiliated with the genus within the family of the class . The percentage similarity between the 16S rRNA gene and GyrB sequences of strain S66 and other members of the genus were 94–95 % and 84–85 %, respectively. Based on the genome sequence of S66, the average nucleotide identity (ANI) between strain S66 and other members of the genus was 77–80 %, and DNA–DNA hybridization prediction showed values of less than 24 % relatedness, respectively, between S66 and other species of the genus . The phenotypic, phylogenetic and genomic analyses support the hypothesis that strain S66 represents a novel species of the genus , for which the name sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is S66 (=LMG 29457=NCIMB 15060=DSM 102834).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.001933
2017-07-01
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/67/7/2242.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.001933&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bowman JP, McCammon SA, Brown JL, McMeekin TA. Glaciecola punicea gen. nov., sp. nov. and Glaciecola pallidula gen. nov., sp. nov.: psychrophilic bacteria from Antarctic sea-ice habitats. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1998; 48:1213–1222 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Jean WD, Hsu CY, Huang S-P, Chen J-S, Lin S et al. Reclassification of [Glaciecola] lipolytica and [Aestuariibacter] litoralis in Aliiglaciecola gen. nov., as Aliiglaciecola lipolytica comb. nov. and Aliiglaciecola litoralis comb. nov., respectively. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:2859–2864 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Shivaji S, Reddy GS. Phylogenetic analyses of the genus Glaciecola: emended description of the genus Glaciecola, transfer of Glaciecola mesophila, G. agarilytica, G. aquimarina, G. arctica, G. chathamensis, G. polaris and G. psychrophila to the genus Paraglaciecola gen. nov. as Paraglaciecola mesophila comb. nov., P. agarilytica comb. nov., P. aquimarina comb. nov., P. arctica comb. nov., P. chathamensis comb. nov., P. polaris comb. nov. and P. psychrophila comb. nov., and description of Paraglaciecola oceanifecundans sp. nov., isolated from the Southern Ocean. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:3264–3275 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Baik KS, Park YD, Seong CN, Kim EM, Bae KS, Chun J. Glaciecola nitratireducens sp. nov., isolated from seawater. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:2185–2188 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Park S, Yoon J-H. Glaciecola aquimarina sp. nov., a gammaproteobacterium isolated from coastal seawater. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2013; 103:1141–1148 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. van Trappen S, Tan TL, Yang J, Mergaert J, Swings J. Glaciecola polaris sp. nov., a novel budding and prosthecate bacterium from the Arctic Ocean, and emended description of the genus Glaciecola . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2004; 54:1765–1771 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen LP, Xu HY, Fu SZ, Fan HX, Liu YH et al. Glaciecola lipolytica sp. nov., isolated from seawater near Tianjin city, China. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:73–76 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Zhang DC, Yu Y, Chen B, Wang HX, Liu HC et al. Glaciecola psychrophila sp. nov., a novel psychrophilic bacterium isolated from the Arctic. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:2867–2869 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Yong JJ, Park SJ, Kim HJ, Rhee SK. Glaciecola agarilytica sp. nov., an agar-digesting marine bacterium from the East Sea, Korea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:951–953 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Matsuyama H, Hirabayashi T, Kasahara H, Minami H, Hoshino T et al. Glaciecola chathamensis sp. nov., a novel marine polysaccharide-producing bacterium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:2883–2886 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhang YJ, Zhang XY, Mi ZH, Chen CX, Gao ZM et al. Glaciecola arctica sp. nov., isolated from Arctic marine sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:2338–2341 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Tanaka N, Romanenko LA, Frolova GM, Mikhailov VV. Aestuariibacter litoralis sp. nov., isolated from a sandy sediment of the Sea of Japan. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:317–320 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Jin HM, Jeong HI, Jeon CO. Aliiglaciecola aliphaticivorans sp. nov., an aliphatic hydrocarbon-degrading bacterium, isolated from a sea-tidal flat and emended description of the genus Aliiglaciecola Jean et al. 2013. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:1550–1555 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Romanenko LA, Zhukova NV, Rohde M, Lysenko AM, Mikhailov VV et al. Glaciecola mesophila sp. nov., a novel marine agar-digesting bacterium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2003; 53:647–651 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Gupta V, Sharma G, Srinivas TNR, Anil Kumar P. Aliiglaciecola coringensis sp. nov., isolated from a water sample collected from mangrove forest in Coringa, Andhra Pradesh, India. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2014; 106:1097–1103 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Qin QL, Xie BB, Yu Y, Shu YL, Rong JC et al. Comparative genomics of the marine bacterial genus G laciecola reveals the high degree of genomic diversity and genomic characteristic for cold adaptation. Environ Microbiol 2014; 16:1642–1653 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Thomas F, Barbeyron T, Michel G. Evaluation of reference genes for real-time quantitative PCR in the marine flavobacterium zobellia galactanivorans . J Microbiol Methods 2011; 84:61–66 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Powers EM. Efficacy of the Ryu non staining KOH technique for rapidly determining Gram reactions of food-borne and water borne bacteria and yeasts.. Appl Environ Microbiol 1995; 61:3756–3758
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Beveridge TJ, Lawrence JR, Murray RGE. Sampling and staining for light microscopy. In Reddy CA, Beveridge TJ, Breznak JA, Marzluf GA, Schmidt TM et al. (editors) Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 2007 pp. 19–33
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Gacesa P, Wusteman FS. Plate assay for simultaneous detection of alginate lyases and determination of substrate specificity. Appl Environ Microbiol 1990; 56:2265–2267
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Liu G, Wu S, Jin W, Sun C. Amy63, a novel type of marine bacterial multifunctional enzyme possessing amylase, agarase and carrageenase activities. Sci Rep 2016; 6:18726 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Miller LT. A single derivatization method for bacterial fatty acid methyl esters including hydroxy acids. J Clin Microbiol 1982; 16:584–586
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Kuykendall LD, Roy MA, O'Neill JJ, Devine TE. Fatty acids, antibiotic resistance, and deoxyribonucleic acid homology groups of Bradyrhizobium japonicum . Int J Syst Bacteriol 1988; 38:358–361 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Tindall BJ. A comparative study of the lipid composition of Halobacterium saccharovorum from various sources. Syst Appl Microbiol 1990; 13:128–130 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Tindall BJ. Lipid composition of Halobacterium lacusprofundi . FEMS Microbiol Lett 1990; 66:199–202 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Tindall BJ, Sikorski J, Smibert RM, Kreig NR. Phenotypic characterization and the principles of comparative systematics. In Reddy CA, Beveridge TJ, Breznak JA, Marzluf G, Schmidt TM et al. (editors) Methods for General and Molecular Microbiology, 3rd. Washington, DC., USA: ASM Press; 2007 pp. 330–393
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Schultz-Johansen M, Glaring MA, Bech PK, Stougaard P. Draft genome sequence of a novel marine bacterium, Paraglaciecola sp. strain S66, with hydrolytic activity against seaweed polysaccharides. Genome Announc 2016; 4:e00304-16 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K, Miyata T. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier Transform. Nucleic Acids Res 2002; 30:3059–3066 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M et al. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 2011; 28:2731–2739 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M, Spröer C, Klenk H-P. When should a DDH experiment be mandatory in microbial taxonomy?. Arch Microbiol 2013; 195:413–418 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Figueras MJ, Beaz-Hidalgo R, Hossain MJ, Liles MR. Taxonomic affiliation of new genomes should be verified using average nucleotide identity and multilocus phylogenetic analysis. Genome Announc 2014; 2:e00927-14 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P et al. DNA–DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:81–91 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Stropko SJ, Pipes SE, Newman JD. Genome-based reclassification of Bacillus cibi as a later heterotypic synonym of Bacillus indicus and emended description of Bacillus indicus . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:3804–3809 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Mcginnis JM, Cole JA, Dickinson MC, Mingle LA, Lapierre P et al. Paracoccus sanguinis sp. nov., isolated from clinical specimens of New York State patients. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:1877–1882 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Jung YJ, Lee YM, Baek K, Hwang CY, Cho Y et al. Algibacter psychrophilus sp. nov., a psychrophilic bacterium isolated from marine sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:1735–1740 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Richter M, Rossello-Mora R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Standard operating procedure for calculating genome-to-genome distances based on high-scoring segment pairs. Stand Genomic Sci 2010; 2:142–148 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.001933
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.001933
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary File 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error