1887

Abstract

AFM10251 was proposed to represent a novel species of a new genus belonging to the family in a previous study. The family , containing one genus, , was proposed subsequently and H195 was the type strain. However, analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity showed that the two strains were highly similar (99.2 %). Phenotypic and chemotaxonomic data, as well as DNA–DNA hybridization confirmed that the two strains are different genomic species of the same genus, should be classified in the genus as comb. nov. The type strain of is H195 (=DSM 46680=CECT 8575).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002022
2017-08-01
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/67/8/2787.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002022&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Lai H, Wei X, Jiang Y, Chen X, Li Q, Qy L et al. Halopolyspora alba gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:2775–2780 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Saker R, Bouras N, Zitouni A, Ghoul M, Rohde M et al. Mzabimyces algeriensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a halophilic filamentous actinobacterium isolated from a Saharan soil, and proposal of Mzabimycetaceae fam. nov. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2014; 106:1021–1030 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Saker R, Bouras N, Zitouni A, Ghoul M, Rohde M et al. Mzabimyces algeriensis gen. nov., sp. nov. and Mzabimycetaceae fam. nov., in list of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly published, Validation list 166. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:3763–3767 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Li WJ, Xu P, Schumann P, Zhang YQ, Pukall R et al. Georgenia ruanii sp. nov., a novel actinobacterium isolated from forest soil in Yunnan (China), and emended description of the genus Georgenia. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:1424–1428 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Kim OS, Cho YJ, Lee K, Yoon SH, Kim M et al. Introducing EzTaxon-e: a prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene sequence database with phylotypes that represent uncultured species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:716–721 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25:4876–4882 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Fitch WM. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst Zool 1971; 20:406–416 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 2013; 30:2725–2729 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. de Ley J, Cattoir H, Reynaerts A. The quantitative measurement of DNA hybridization from renaturation rates. Eur J Biochem 1970; 12:133–142 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Huss VA, Festl H, Schleifer KH. Studies on the spectrophotometric determination of DNA hybridization from renaturation rates. Syst Appl Microbiol 1983; 4:184–192 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Wayne LG, Brenner DJ, Colwell RR, Grimont PAD, Kandler O et al. International committee on systematic bacteriology. report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1987; 37:463–464 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980; 16:111–120 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002022
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002022
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error