1887

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY logo

Volume 67, Issue 9

sp. nov., isolated from a water convolvulus field Free

Abstract

A bacterial strain designated Tese-5 was isolated from a water convolvulus field in Taiwan and characterized using the polyphasic taxonomic approach. Strain Tese-5 was an aerobic, Gram-stain-negative, non-motile, rod-shaped bacterium and formed bright yellow coloured colonies. Strain Tese-5 grew at 15–35 °C (optimum, 30 °C), with 0–1.0 % NaCl (optimum, 0–0.5 %) and at pH 5.5–7 (optimum, pH 6). The major fatty acids (>10 %) of strain Tese-5 were Cω, summed feature 3 (Cω7 and/or Cω6) and C. The polar lipid profile comprised phosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine, diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylmonomethylethanolamine, phosphatidyldimethylethanolamine and sphingoglycolipid. The major polyamine was spermidine. The major isoprenoid quinone was Q-10. The DNA G+C content was 65.7 mol%. Phylogenetic analyses based on 16S rRNA gene sequences showed that strain Tese-5 belonged to the genus and showed the highest levels of sequence similarity to BUT-14 and SM117 (96.3 %). Phenotypic characteristics of the novel strain also differed from those of the closest-related species of the genus . On the basis of the genotypic, chemotaxonomic and phenotypic data, strain Tese-5 represents a novel species in the genus , for which the name sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is Tese-5 (=BCRC 80904=LMG 28838=KCTC 42656).

  • Received:
  • Accepted:
  • Published Online:
Keyword(s): Alphaproteobacteria , new taxa , Novosphingobium ipomoeae , Proteobacteria , Sphingomonadaceae and water convolvulus field
© 2017 IUMS
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002174
2017-09-01
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/67/9/3590.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002174&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Takeuchi M, Hamana K, Hiraishi A. Proposal of the genus Sphingomonas sensu stricto and three new genera, Sphingobium, Novosphingobium and Sphingopyxis, on the basis of phylogenetic and chemotaxonomic analyses. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2001; 51:1405–1417 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Lee LH, Azman AS, Zainal N, Eng SK, Fang CM et al. Novosphingobium malaysiense sp. nov. isolated from mangrove sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:1194–1201 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Lin SY, Hameed A, Liu YC, Hsu YH, Lai WA et al. Novosphingobium arabidopsis sp. nov., a DDT-resistant bacterium isolated from the rhizosphere of Arabidopsis thaliana. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:594–598 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen WM, Laevens S, Lee TM, Coenye T, de Vos P et al. Ralstonia taiwanensis sp. nov., isolated from root nodules of Mimosa species and sputum of a cystic fibrosis patient. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2001; 51:1729–1735 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol 1991; 173:697–703 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Anzai Y, Kudo Y, Oyaizu H. The phylogeny of the genera Chryseomonas, Flavimonas, and Pseudomonas supports synonymy of these three genera. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1997; 47:249–251 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Kim OS, Cho YJ, Lee K, Yoon SH, Kim M et al. Introducing EzTaxon-e: a prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene sequence database with phylotypes that represent uncultured species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:716–721 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Cole JR, Wang Q, Cardenas E, Fish J, Chai B et al. The ribosomal database project: improved alignments and new tools for rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 2009; 37:D141–D145 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Hall TA. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 1999; 41:95–98
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016; 33:1870–1874 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA et al. CLUSTAL W and CLUSTAL X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 2007; 23:2947–2948 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Kimura M. The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1983 [CrossRef]
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425[PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Kluge AG, Farris JS. Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of Anurans. Syst Zool 1969; 18:1–32 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Felsenstein J. PHYLIP (phylogeny inference package), version 3.5c Seattle, USA: Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington; Distributed by the author 1993
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Powers EM. Efficacy of the ryu nonstaining KOH technique for rapidly determining gram reactions of food-borne and waterborne bacteria and yeasts. Appl Environ Microbiol 1995; 61:3756–3758[PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Beveridge TJ, Lawrence JR, Murray RGE. Sampling and staining for light microscopy. In Beveridge TJ, Breznak JA, Marzluf GA, Schmidt TM, Snyder LR et al. (editors) Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 2007 pp. 19–33
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Breznak JA, Costilow RN. Physicochemical factors in growth. In Beveridge TJ, Breznak JA, Marzluf GA, Schmidt TM, Snyder LR et al. (editors) Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 2007 pp. 309–329
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Tindall BJ, Sikorski J, Smibert RA, Krieg NR. Phenotypic characterization and the principles of comparative systematic. In Beveridge TJ, Breznak JA, Marzluf GA, Schmidt TM, Snyder LR et al. (editors) Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 2007 pp. 330–393
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Wen CM, Tseng CS, Cheng CY, Li YK. Purification, characterization and cloning of a chitinase from Bacillus sp. NCTU2. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 2002; 35:213–219 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Bowman JP. Description of Cellulophaga algicola sp. nov., isolated from the surfaces of Antarctic algae, and reclassification of Cytophaga uliginosa (ZoBell and Upham 1944) Reichenbach 1989 as Cellulophaga uliginosa comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2000; 50:1861–1868 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Chang SC, Wang JT, Vandamme P, Hwang JH, Chang PS et al. Chitinimonas taiwanensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel chitinolytic bacterium isolated from a freshwater pond for shrimp culture. Syst Appl Microbiol 2004; 27:43–49 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Nokhal T-H, Schlegel HG. Taxonomic study of Paracoccus denitrificans. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1983; 33:26–37 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Sasser M. Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids, MIDI Technical Note 101. Newark, DE: MIDI Inc; 1990
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Collins MD. Isoprenoid quinones. In Goodfellow M, O’Donnell AG. (editors) Chemical Methods in Prokaryotic Systematics Chichester: Wiley; 1994 pp. 265–309
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Mesbah M, Premachandran U, Whitman WB. Precise measurement of the G+C content of deoxyribonucleic acid by high-performance liquid chromatography. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1989; 39:159–167 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Embley TM, Wait R. Structural lipids of eubacteria. In Goodfellow M, O’Donnell AG. (editors) Chemical Methods in Prokaryotic Systematics Chichester: Wiley; 1994 pp. 121–161
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Gupta SK, Lal D, Lal R. Novosphingobium panipatense sp. nov. and Novosphingobium mathurense sp. nov., from oil-contaminated soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:156–161 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Kämpfer P, Young CC, Busse HJ, Lin SY, Rekha PD et al. Novosphingobium soli sp. nov., isolated from soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:259–263 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Tiirola MA, Busse HJ, Kämpfer P, Männistö MK. Novosphingobium lentum sp. nov., a psychrotolerant bacterium from a polychlorophenol bioremediation process. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55:583–588 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Chen Q, Zhang J, Wang CH, Jiang J, Kwon SW et al. Novosphingobium chloroacetimidivorans sp. nov., a chloroacetamide herbicide-degrading bacterium isolated from activated sludge. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:2573–2578 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Busse J, Auling G. Polyamine pattern as a chemotaxonomic marker within the Proteobacteria. Syst Appl Microbiol 1988; 11:1–8 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Busse H-J, Bunka S, Hensel A, Lubitz W. Discrimination of members of the family Pasteurellaceae based on polyamine patterns. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1997; 47:698–708 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Kämpfer P, Rosselló-Mora R, Hermansson M, Persson F, Huber B et al. Undibacterium pigrum gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from drinking water. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:1510–1515 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002174
Loading
Novosphingobium ipomoeae sp. nov., isolated from a water convolvulus field
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 67, 3590 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.002174
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002174
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002174
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary File 1

PDF

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error