1887

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY logo

Volume 67, Issue 10

sp. nov., isolated from reclaimed grassland soil Free

Abstract

A novel strain, DKC-1, was isolated from reclaimed grassland soil and was characterized taxonomically by a polyphasic approach. Strain DKC-1 was a Gram-staining-negative, light-yellow-coloured and rod shaped bacterium, motile with polar flagellum. It was able to grow at 20–37 °C, at pH 4.5–9.0 and with 0–3 % (w/v) NaCl concentration. Based on the 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis, strain DKC-1 formed a clade within the members of the genus and showed highest sequence similarities to XD53 (98.36 %), sjH1 (97.92 %), THG-DD7 (97.74 %), THG-B117 (97.65 %) and GP18-1 (97.40 %). The only respiratory quinone was ubiquinone-8. The major polar lipids were phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylglycerol, diphosphatidylglycerol and phosphatidyl--methylethanolamine. The predominant fatty acids of strain DKC-1 were iso-C, iso-C, summed feature 9 (iso-Cω9 and/or C 10-methyl), iso-C, iso-C 3-OH and iso-C. The genomic DNA G+C content of this novel strain was 63.1 mol%. The DNA–DNA relatedness between strain DKC-1 and its reference strains ( XD53, sjH1, THG-DD7, THG-B117 and GP18-1) was 52.3, 44.7, 38.7, 49.0 and 32.7 %, respectively, which falls below the threshold value of 70 % for the strain to be considered as novel. The morphological, physiological, chemotaxonomic and phylogenetic analyses clearly distinguished this strain from its closest phylogenetic neighbours. Thus, strain DKC-1 represents a novel species of the genus , for which the name sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is DKC-1 (=KEMB 9005-571=KACC 19176=JCM 31925).

  • Received:
  • Accepted:
  • Published Online:
Keyword(s): Dyella agri sp. nov. , Proteobacteria , reclaimed grassland soil and Xanthomonadaceae
© 2017 IUMS
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002291
2017-10-01
2024-04-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/67/10/4246.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002291&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Xie CH, Yokota A. Dyella japonica gen. nov., sp. nov., a γ-proteobacterium isolated from soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55:753–756 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Son HM, Yang JE, Yi EJ, Park Y, Won KH et al. Dyella kyungheensis sp. nov., isolated from soil of a cornus fruit field. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:3807–3811 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Jung HM, Ten LN, Kim KH, An DS, Im WT et al. Dyella ginsengisoli sp. nov., isolated from soil of a ginseng field in South Korea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:460–465 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhao F, Guo XQ, Wang P, He LY, Huang Z et al. Dyella jiangningensis sp. nov., a γ-proteobacterium isolated from the surface of potassium-bearing rock. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:3154–3157 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  5. An DS, Im WT, Yang HC, Yang DC, Lee ST. Dyella koreensis sp. nov., a β-glucosidase-producing bacterium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55:1625–1628 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Lee DW, Lee SD. Dyella marensis sp. nov., isolated from cliff soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:1397–1400 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Kim BY, Weon HY, Lee KH, Seok SJ, Kwon SW et al. Dyella yeojuensis sp. nov., isolated from greenhouse soil in Korea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:2079–2082 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Tang L, Chen MH, Nie XC, Ma MR, Qiu LH. Dyella lipolytica sp. nov., a lipolytic bacterium isolated from lower subtropical forest soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1235–1240 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen MH, Lv YY, Wang J, Tang L, Qiu LH. Dyella humi sp. nov., isolated from forest soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:4372–4376 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Chaudhary DK, Kim J. Novosphingobium naphthae sp. nov., from oil-contaminated soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:3170–3176 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Marmur J. A procedure for the isolation of deoxyribonucleic acid from micro-organisms. J Mol Biol 1961; 3:208–218 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Frank JA, Reich CI, Sharma S, Weisbaum JS, Wilson BA et al. Critical evaluation of two primers commonly used for amplification of bacterial 16S rRNA genes. Appl Environ Microbiol 2008; 74:2461–2470 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25:4876–4882 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Hall TA. BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 1999; 41:95–98
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425[PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Fitch WM. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst Zool 1971; 20:406–416 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 2013; 30:2725–2729 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980; 16:111–120 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Yarza P, Richter M, Peplies J, Euzeby J, Amann R et al. The all-species living tree project: a 16S rRNA-based phylogenetic tree of all sequenced type strains. Syst Appl Microbiol 2008; 31:241–250 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Stackebrandt E, Goebel BM. Taxonomic note: a place for DNA-DNA reassociation and 16S rRNA sequence analysis in the present species definition in bacteriology. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1994; 44:846–849 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Doetsch RN. Determinative methods of light microscopy. In Gerhardt P. (editor) Manual of Methods for General Bacteriology Washington, DC, USA: American Society for Microbiology; 1981 pp. 21–33
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Powers EM. Efficacy of the Ryu nonstaining KOH technique for rapidly determining gram reactions of food-borne and waterborne bacteria and yeasts. Appl Environ Microbiol 1995; 61:3756–3758[PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Chaudhary DK, Kim J. Arvibacter flaviflagrans gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from forest soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:4347–4354 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Breznak JA, Costilow RN. Physicochemical factors in growth. In Beveridge TJ, Breznak JA, Marzluf GA, Schmidt TM, Snyder LR et al. (editors) Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 2007 pp. 309–329
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Hemraj V, Diksha S, Avneet G. A review on commonly used biochemical test for bacteria. Innovare J Life Sci 2013; 1:1–7
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Chaudhary DK, Kim J. Sphingomonas naphthae sp. nov., isolated from oil-contaminated soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:4621–4627 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Tindall BJ, Sikorski J, Smibert RA, Krieg NR. Phenotypic characterization and the principles of comparative systematics. In Reddy CA, Beveridge TJ, Breznak JA, Marzluf GA, Schmidt TM et al. (editors) Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: ASM Press; 2007 pp. 330–393
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Smibert RM, Krieg NR. Phenotypic characterization. In Gerhardt P, Murray RGE, Wood WA, Krieg NR. (editors) Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology Washington, DC, USA: American Society for Microbiology; 1994 pp. 607–654
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Cowan ST, Steel KJ. Manual for the Identification of Medical Bacteria London: Cambridge University Press; 1965
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Minnikin DE, O'Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods 1984; 2:233–241 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Komagata K, Suzuki K. Lipids and cell wall analysis in bacterial systematics. Methods Microbiol 1987; 19:161–203 [Crossref]
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Hiraishi A, Ueda Y, Ishihara J, Mori T. Comparative lipoquinone analysis of influent sewage and activated sludge by high-performance liquid chromatography and photodiode array detection. J Gen Appl Microbiol 1996; 42:457–469 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Collins MD, Jones D. Distribution of isoprenoid quinone structural types in bacteria and their taxonomic implication. Microbiol Rev 1981; 45:316–354[PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Sasser M. Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids, MIDI Technical Note 101. Newark, DE: MIDI Inc; 1990
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Mesbah M, Premachandran U, Whitman WB. Precise measurement of the G+C content of deoxyribonucleic acid by high-performance liquid chromatography. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1989; 39:159–167 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Ezaki T, Hashimoto Y, Yabuuchi E. Fluorometric deoxyribonucleic acid-deoxyribonucleic acid hybridization in microdilution wells as an alternative to membrane filter hybridization in which radioisotopes are used to determine genetic relatedness among bacterial strains. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1989; 39:224–229 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Won K, Singh H, Ngo HT, Son H, Kook M et al. Rhodanobacter koreensis sp. nov., a bacterium isolated from tomato rhizosphere. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:1180–1185 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Wayne LG, Moore WEC, Stackebrandt E, Kandler O, Colwell RR et al. Report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1987; 37:463–464 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Weon HY, Kim BY, Hong SB, Jeon YA, Kwon SW et al. Rhodanobacter ginsengisoli sp. nov. and Rhodanobacter terrae sp. nov., isolated from soil cultivated with Korean ginseng. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:2810–2813 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Koh HW, Hong H, Min UG, Kang MS, Kim SG et al. Rhodanobacter aciditrophus sp. nov., an acidophilic bacterium isolated from mine wastewater. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:4574–4579 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002291
Loading
Dyella agri sp. nov., isolated from reclaimed grassland soil
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 67, 4246 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.002291
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002291
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002291
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary File 2

PDF

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error