1887

Abstract

A rod-shaped, Gram-stain-positive, non-flagellated, facultatively anaerobic bacterium, designated SYF10-1a, was isolated from Nuruk, a Korean traditional fermentation starter. It grew at 4–40 °C (optimum 37 °C), at pH 3.0–9.0 (optimum, pH 7.0) and with 0–5 % (w/v) NaCl. Phylogenetic analysis using 16S rRNA gene sequences revealed that strain SYF10-1a belonged to the genus Lactobacillus and showed the highest sequence similarity of 98.7 % to Lactobacillus crustorum LMG 23699. A comparison of two housekeeping genes, pheS and rpoA, supported the suggestion that strain SYF10-1a fell within the radius of the genus Lactobacillus , but was clearly separated from its closest related species. The average nucleotide identity value and digital DNA–DNA hybridization value between strain SYF10-1a and the most closely related species, L. crustorum LMG 23699, were 80.5 and 33.3 %, respectively. The predominant cellular fatty acids were C16 : 0, C18 : 1ω9c, C18 : 1ω7c and summed feature 3 (including iso-C15 : 0 2-OH and/or C16 : 1ω7c). Polar lipids were diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylglycerol, two unidentified aminolipids and two unidentified glycolipids. The cell-wall peptidoglycan was of the A4α type with an interpeptide bridge comprising l-Lys-d-Asp. The DNA G+C content was 34.2 mol%. On the basis of this taxonomic study, strain SYF10-1a represents a novel species within the genus Lactobacillus , for which the name Lactobacillus nuruki sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is SYF10-1a (=KACC 18726=NBRC 112011).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002976
2018-08-29
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/68/10/3273.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002976&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Canchaya C, Claesson MJ, Fitzgerald GF, van Sinderen D, O'Toole PW. Diversity of the genus Lactobacillus revealed by comparative genomics of five species. Microbiology 2006; 152:3185–3196 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Falsen E, Pascual C, Sjödén B, Ohlén M, Collins MD. Phenotypic and phylogenetic characterization of a novel Lactobacillus species from human sources: description of Lactobacillus iners sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1999; 49:217–221 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Germond JE, Lapierre L, Delley M, Mollet B, Felis GE et al. Evolution of the bacterial species Lactobacillus delbrueckii: a partial genomic study with reflections on prokaryotic species concept. Mol Biol Evol 2003; 20:93–104 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Siezen RJ, Tzeneva VA, Castioni A, Wels M, Phan HT et al. Phenotypic and genomic diversity of Lactobacillus plantarum strains isolated from various environmental niches. Environ Microbiol 2010; 12:758–773 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bal J, Yun SH, Choi MS, Yeo SH, Kim JM et al. Pyrosequencing reveals bacterial diversity in Korean traditional wheat-based nuruk. J Microbiol 2015; 53:812–819 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Tatusova T, Dicuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP et al. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44:6614–6624 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Pruesse E, Peplies J, Glöckner FO. SINA: accurate high-throughput multiple sequence alignment of ribosomal RNA genes. Bioinformatics 2012; 28:1823–1829 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 1994; 22:4673–4680 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 2013; 30:2725–2729 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Fitch WM. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst Zool 1971; 20:406–416 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980; 16:111–120 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Kim M, Oh HS, Park SC, Chun J. Towards a taxonomic coherence between average nucleotide identity and 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity for species demarcation of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:346–351 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Christensen H, Arahal DR et al. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:461–466 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Auch AF, von Jan M, Klenk HP, Göker M. Digital DNA-DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison. Stand Genomic Sci 2010; 2:117–134 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Schaeffer AB, Fulton MD. A simplified method of staining endo-spores. Science 1993; 77:194 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Sasser M. Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids, MIDI Technical Note 101. Newark, DE, USA: Microbial ID Inc; 1990
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Minnikin DE, O'Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods 1984; 2:233–241 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hamada M, Tamura T, Yamamura H, Suzuki K, Hayakawa M et al. Lysinimicrobium mangrovi gen. nov., sp. nov., an actinobacterium isolated from the rhizosphere of a mangrove. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:1731–1735
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Schleifer KH, Kandler O. Peptidoglycan types of bacterial cell walls and their taxonomic implications. Bacteriol Rev 1972; 36:407–477[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Scheirlinck I, van der Meulen R, van Schoor A, Huys G, Vandamme P et al. Lactobacillus crustorum sp. nov., isolated from two traditional Belgian wheat sourdoughs. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:1461–1467 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Chao SH, Kudo Y, Tsai YC, Watanabe K. Lactobacillus futsaii sp. nov., isolated from fu-tsai and suan-tsai, traditional Taiwanese fermented mustard products. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:489–494 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Reuter G. Lactobacillus alimentarius sp. nov., nom rev. and Lactobacillus farciminis sp. nov., nom. rev. Syst Appl Microbiol 1983; 4:277–279 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Chang CH, Chen YS, Lee TT, Chang YC, Yu B et al. Lactobacillus formosensis sp.286 nov., a lactic acid bacterium isolated from fermented soybean meal. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:101–106
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002976
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002976
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary File 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error