1887

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY logo

Volume 70, Issue 1

sp. nov., isolated from tree bark of Linn. in Thailand Free

Abstract

A novel actinomycete strain, Bv016, belonging to the genus , was isolated from the bark of tree, Linn., collected in Thailand. The taxonomic position of the strain was characterized by using a polyphasic approach. -Diaminopimelic acid, glucose, mannose, ribose and galactose were detected in its whole-cell hydrolysates. The -acyl type of muramic acid was acetyl. The strain contained anteiso-C , iso-C , iso-C and iso-C as the major fatty acids and MK-9(H), MK-9(H) and MK-9(H) as the major menaquinones. The major polar lipids were diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylinositol and phosphatidylinositol mannoside. The strain was closely related to JCM 4041 (98.4 %), JCM 10116 (98.4 %) and JCM 4408 (98.2 %). The draft genome of Bv016 was 6.74 Mb with 5949 coding sequences with an average G+C content of 71.7 mol%. The ANIb and ANIm values of strain Bv016 were 94.1 and 95.2 %, respectively, and the digital DNA–DNA hybridization value was 60.6 % in comparison with the draft genome of JCM 4765. The results of the taxonomic analysis suggested that strain Bv016 represented a novel species of the genus for which the name sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is Bv016 (=JCM 33208=TISTR 2645).

  • Received:
  • Accepted:
  • Published Online:
Keyword(s): actinomycetes , polyphasic taxonomy , Streptomyces bauhiniae , streptomycetaceae and tree bark
Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Chulalongkorn University (Award GCURP_58_01_33_01)
    • Principle Award Recipient: Somboon Tanasupawat
© 2020 The Authors
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003743
2019-10-08
2024-05-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/70/1/228.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003743&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Waksman SA, Henrici AT. The nomenclature and classification of the actinomycetes. J Bacteriol 1943; 46:337–341
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Bérdy J. Bioactive microbial metabolites. J Antibiot 2005; 58:1–26 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Kämpfer P, Genus I. Streptomyces Waksman and Henrici 1943, 339AL emend. Witt and Stackebrandt 1990, 370 emend. Wellington, Stackebrandt, Sanders, Wolstrup and Jorgensen 1992, 159. In Goodfellow M, Kämpfer P, Busse HJ, Trujillo ME, Suzuki KI. (editors) Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology Part B 5, 2nd ed. NewYork: Springer; 2012 pp 1455–1767
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Currie CR, Scott JA, Summerbell RC, Malloch D. Fungus-Growing ants use antibiotic-producing bacteria to control garden parasites. Nature 1999; 398:701–704 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Mingma R, Duangmal K, Thamchaipenet A, Trakulnaleamsai S, Matsumoto A et al. Streptomyces oryzae sp. nov., an endophytic actinomycete isolated from stems of rice plant. J Antibiot 2015; 68:368–372 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Hayakawa M, Nonomura H. Humic acid-vitamin agar, a new medium for the selective isolation of soil actinomycetes. Journal of Fermentation Technology 1987; 65:501–509 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Shirling EB, Gottlieb D. Methods for characterization of Streptomyces species. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1966; 16:313–340 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Torikata A, Enokita R, Okazaki T, Nakajima M, Iwado S et al. Mycoplanecins, novel antimycobacterial antibiotics from Actinoplanes awajinensis subsp. mycoplanecinus subsp. nov. I. taxonomy of producing organism and fermentation. J Antibiot 1983; 36:957–960 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Kelly KL. Inter-Society Color Council - National Bureau of Standards Color Name Charts Illustrated with Centroid Colors Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1964
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Arai T. Culture Media for Actinomycetes Tokyo: The Society for Actinomycetes Japan; 1975
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Gordon RE, Barnett DA, Handerhan JE, Pang CHN. Nocardia coeliaca, Nocardia autotrophica, and the Nocardin strain. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1974; 24:54–63 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Staneck JL, Roberts GD. Simplified approach to identification of aerobic actinomycetes by thin-layer chromatography. Appl Microbiol 1974; 28:226–231
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Uchida K, Aida KO. An improved method for the glycolate test for simple identification of the acyl type of bacterial cell walls. J Gen Appl Microbiol 1984; 30:131–134 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Minnikin DE, O'Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods 1984; 2:233–241 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Collins MD, Pirouz T, Goodfellow M, Minnikin DE. Distribution of menaquinones in actinomycetes and corynebacteria. J Gen Microbiol 1977; 100:221–230 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Sasser M. Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids, MIDI Technical Note 101. Newark, DE: MIDI Inc; 1990
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Tamaoka J, Komagata K. Determination of DNA base composition by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1984; 25:125–128 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol 1991; 173:697–703 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Lane DJ. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In Stackebrandt E, Goodfellow M. (editors) Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics Chichester: Wiley; 1991 pp 115–148
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically United database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Kluge AG, Farris JS. Quantitative Phyletics and the evolution of anurans. Syst Zool 1969; 18:1–32 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016; 33:1870–1874 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980; 16:111–120 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 2012; 19:455–477 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T et al. The RAST server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 2008; 9:75 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Aziz RK, Devoid S, Disz T, Edwards RA, Henry CS et al. Seed servers: high-performance access to the seed genomes, annotations, and metabolic models. PLoS One 2012; 7:e48053 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun 2019; 10:2182 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R, Oliver Glöckner F, Peplies J. JSpeciesWS: a web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics 2016; 32:929–931 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Lechevalier MP, De Bievre C, Lechevalier H. Chemotaxonomy of aerobic actinomycetes: phospholipid composition. Biochem Syst Ecol 1977; 5:249–260 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Kim SB, Lonsdale J, Seong CN, Goodfellow M. Streptacidiphilus gen. nov., acidophilic actinomycetes with wall chemotype I and emendation of the family Streptomycetaceae (Waksman and Henrici (1943)AL) emend. Rainey et al. 1997. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2003; 83:107–116 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003743
Loading
Streptomyces bauhiniae sp. nov., isolated from tree bark of Bauhinia variegata Linn. in Thailand
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 70, 228 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.003743
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003743
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003743
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error