1887

Abstract

ABSTRACT

The results of a search for a neotype strain of Guillebeau 1891 indicate either that the strain CCM 764 should be designated neotype strain of and that this pecies be defined accordingly, or (2) that the name should be placed in the list of as a . It is recommended that the Subcommittee on Taxonomy of Staphylococci and Micrococci of the International Committee on Nomenclature of Bacteria be invited to evaluate the situation and subsequently initiate any action that may seem necessary in relation to the Judicial Commission.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-20-3-249
1970-07-01
2024-04-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/20/3/ijs-20-3-249.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-20-3-249&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Auletta A. E., Kennedy E. R. 1966; Deoxyribonucleic acid base composition o some members of the Micrococcaceae. J. Bact. 92:28–34
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bergan T., Bøvre K., Hovig B. 1970a; Reisolation of Micrococcus mucilaginosus Migula 1900. Acta Path. Microbiol. Scand. (in press)
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bergan T., Bøvre K., Hovig B. 1970b; A contribution to the taxonomy of strains within the Micrococcaceae. . Fol. Fac. Sci. Univ. Brunensis. (in press)
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Boháček J., Kocur M. 1970; DNA base composition and classification of Micrococcaceae. Fol. Fac. Sci. Univ. Brunensis. (in press)
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bergey D. M., Harrison F. C., Breed R. S., Hammer B. W., Huntoon F. M. 1923; Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology. , 1st ed.. Williams and Wilkins Company; Baltimore.:
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Breed R. S., Murray E. G. D., Smith N. R. 1957; Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology. , 7th ed.. Williams and Wilkins Company.; Baltimore.:
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Editorial Board of the Judicial Commission 1966; International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria. Intl. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 16:459–490
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Evans J. B., Bradford W. L., Niven C. F. 1955; Comments concerning the taxonomy of the genera Micrococcus and Staphylococcus. Intl. Bull. Bact. Nomencl. Taxon. 5:61–66
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Guillebeau A. 1891; Beiträge zur Lehre von den Ursachen der Fadenziehenden Milch. Landwirtschaftliches Jahrbuch der Schweitz. 5:135–140
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Henriksen S. D. 1948; Some unusual mucoid organisms. Acta Path. Microbiol. Scand. 25:485–492
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hucker G. J. 1924; Studies on the Coccaceae. IV. The classification of the genus Micrococcus Cohn. New York State Agr. Expt. Sta. Tech. Bull 102:
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Krasil’nikov N. A. 1949; Diagnostik der Bakterien und Actinomyceten. VEB Gustav Fischer Verlag. Jena 1959. Translation of the Russian edition published in Moscow in 1949
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Migula W. 1900; System der Bakterien. Gustav Fischer. Jena.:
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Sandvik O. 1969 Personal communication
  15. Thatcher F. S., Simon W. 1957; Some physiological and taxigenic properties of members of the genus Micrococcus in relation to Taxonomy. Intl. Bull. Bact. Nomencl. Taxon. 7:21–36
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Winslow C. -E. A., Winslow A. R. 1908; The systematic relationships of the Coccaceae. John Wiley and Sons. New York.:199–204
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-20-3-249
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-20-3-249
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error