1887

Abstract

The taxonomic position of four newly isolated marine, heterotrophic, gliding, Gram-negative, aerobic, pigmented, agarolytic bacteria was established. 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis indicated affiliation of the isolates to the genus in the family . DNA–DNA hybridization experiments revealed that the strains studied represent three distinct and novel species, for which the names sp. nov., sp. nov. and sp. nov. are proposed, with KMM 3526 (=LMG 22069=CCUG 47080), KMM 3676 (=LMG 22070=CCUG 47083) and KMM 3677 (=LMG 22071=CCUG 47084), respectively, as the type strains.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijs.0.63091-0
2004-09-01
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/54/5/ijs541643.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijs.0.63091-0&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Barbeyron T., L'Haridon S., Corre E., Kloareg B., Potin P. 2001; Zobellia galactanovorans gen. nov., sp. nov., a marine species of Flavobacteriaceae isolated from a red alga, and classification of [ Cytophaga ] uliginosa (ZoBell and Upham 1944) Reichenbach 1989 as Zobellia uliginosa gen. nov., comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 51:985–997 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bowman J. P. 2000; Description of Cellulophaga algicola sp. nov., isolated from the surfaces of Antarctic algae, and reclassification of Cytophaga uliginosa (ZoBell and Upham 1944) Reichenbach 1989 as Cellulophaga uliginosa comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 50:1861–1868
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Ezaki T., Hashimoto Y., Yabuuchi E. 1989; Fluorometric deoxyribonucleic acid-deoxyribonucleic acid hybridization in microdilution wells as an alternative to membrane filter hybridization in which radioisotopes are used to determine genetic relatedness among bacterial strains. Int J Syst Bacteriol 39:224–229 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Felsenstein F. 1995 phylip (Phylogeny Inference Package) version 3.57c Seattle: University of Washington;
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Gerhardt P., Murray R. G. E., Wood W. A., Krieg N. R. (editors) 1994 Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology;
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Hiraishi A. 1992; Direct automated sequencing of 16S rDNA amplified by polymerase chain reaction from bacterial cultures without DNA purification. Lett Appl Microbiol 15:210–213 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Kimura M. 1980; A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16:111–120 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Leisner J. J., Vancanneyt M., Lefebvre K., Vandemeulebroecke K., Hoste B., Euras Vilalta N., Rusul G., Swings J. 2002; Lactobacillus durianis sp. nov., isolated from an acid-fermented condiment (tempoyak) in Malaysia. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52:927–931 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Lemos M. L., Toranzo A. E., Barja J. L. 1985; Modified medium for oxidation-fermentation test in the identification of marine bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 40:1541–1543
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Marmur J. 1961; A procedure for the isolation of deoxyribonucleic acid from microorganisms. J Mol Biol 3:208–218 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Marmur J., Doty P. 1962; Determination of the base composition of deoxyribonucleic acid from its thermal denaturation temperature. J Mol Biol 5:109–118 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Mesbah M., Premachandran U., Whitman W. B. 1989; Precise measurement of the G+C content of deoxyribonucleic acid by high-performance liquid chromatography. Int J Syst Bacteriol 38:159–167
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Nakagawa Y., Yamasato K. 1993; Phylogenetic diversity of the genus Cytophaga revealed by 16S rRNA sequencing and menaquinone analysis. J Gen Microbiol 139:1155–1161 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Nedashkovskaya O. I., Suzuki M., Vysotskii M. V., Mikhailov V. V. 2003; Reichenbachia agariperforans gen. nov., sp. nov. a novel marine bacterium in the phylum Cytophaga–Flavobacterium–Bacteroides . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 53:81–85 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Pitcher D. G., Saunders N. A., Owen R. J. 1989; Rapid extraction of bacterial genomic DNA with guanidium thiocyanate. Lett Appl Microbiol 8:151–156 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Reichenbach H. 1989; Genus I. Cytophaga Winogradsky 1929, 577,AL emend. In Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology vol 3 pp  2015–2050 Edited by Staley J. T., Bryant M. P., Pfennig N., Holt J. C. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins;
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Saitou N., Nei M. 1987; The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Suzuki M., Nakagawa Y., Harayama S., Yamamoto S. 2001; Phylogenetic analysis and taxonomic study of marine Cytophaga -like bacteria: proposal for Tenacibaculum gen. nov. with Tenacibaculum maritimum comb.nov. and Tenacibaculum ovolyticum comb. nov., and description of Tenacibaculum mesophilum sp.nov. and Tenacibaculum amylolyticum sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 51:1639–1652 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Thompson J. D., Higgins D. G., Gibson T. J. 1994; clustal w: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22:4673–4680 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Van de Peer Y., De Rijk P., Wuyts J., Winkelmans T., De Wachter R. 2000; The European small subunit ribosomal RNA database. Nucleic Acids Res 28:175–176 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. ZoBell C. E., Upham H. C. 1944; A list of marine bacteria including descriptions of sixty new species. Bull Scripps Inst Oceanogr Univ Calif 5:239–292
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijs.0.63091-0
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijs.0.63091-0
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error