1887

Abstract

It is proposed that has priority as the earlier heterotypic (subjective) synonym when it is united with . The nomenclatural status of as a later heterotypic synonym of the united species is not lost and it remains the type species of the genus. Request for an Opinion.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijs.0.64030-0
2006-02-01
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/56/2/491.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijs.0.64030-0&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Beijerinck M. W., van Delden A. 1902; Ueber die Assimilation des freien Stickstoffs durch Bakterien. Zentralb Bakteriol Parasitenkd Infekt 2:3–43 (in German
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bouzar H. 1994; Request for a judicial opinion concerning the type species of Agrobacterium . Int J Syst Bacteriol 44:373–374 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bradbury J. F. 1986 Guide to Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Kew, UK: CAB International Mycological Institute;
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Buchanan R. E., Holt J. G., Lessel E. F. (editors) 1966 Index Bergeyana an Annotated Alphabetical Listing of Names of Taxa of the Bacteria Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins;
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Conn H. J. 1942; Validity of the genus Alcaligenes . J Bacteriol 44:353–360
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Editorial Board. 1958; Foreword to the first edition. In International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria, (1976) pp xiv–xxv Edited by Lapage S. P., Sneath P. H. A., Lessel E. F., Skerman V. B. D., Seeliger H. P. R., Clark W. A. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology;
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Frederiksen W. 1995; Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology. Minutes of the meetings, 2 and 6 July, 1994, Prague, Czech Republic. Int J Syst Bacteriol 45:195–196 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Greuter W., Hawksworth D. L., McNeill J., Mayo M. A., Minelli A., Sneath P. H. A., Tindall B. J., Trehane P., Tubbs P. 1996; Draft BioCode: the prospective international rules for the scientific names of organisms. Taxon 45:349–372 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Greuter W., McNeill J., Barrie F. R. 9 other authors 2000; International Code of Botanical Nomenclature ( Saint Louis Code). Regnum Vegetabile series, volume 138. Königstein, Germany: Koeltz Scientific Books;
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Holmes B., Roberts P. 1981; The classification, identification and nomenclature of agrobacteria. J Appl Bacteriol 50:443–467 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. International Code of Zoological Nomenclature 2000, 4th edition. http://www.iczn.org/code.htm
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Judicial Commission 1970; Opinion 33. Conservation of the generic name Agrobacterium Conn 1942. Int J Syst Bacteriol 20:10 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kersters K., De Ley J. 1984; Genus III. Agrobacterium Conn 1942, 359AL . In Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology vol 1 pp  244–254 Edited by Krieg N. R., Holt J. G. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins;
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Lapage S. P., Sneath P. H. A., Lessel E. F., Skerman V. B. D., Seeliger H. P. R., Clark W. A. (editors) 1992; International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria (1990 Revision) . Bacteriological Code Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology;
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Moore L. W., Bouzar H., Burr T. 2001; Agrobacterium . In Laboratory Guide for the Identification of Plant Pathogenic Bacteria . , 3rd edn. pp  17–35 Edited by Schaad N. W., Jones J. B., Chun W. St Paul, MN: American Phytopathological Society;
  16. Murray R. G. E., Brenner D. J., Colwell R. R., De Vos P., Goodfellow M., Grimont P. A. D., Pfennig N., Stackebrandt E., Zavarzin G. A. 1990; Report of the ad hoc committee on approaches to taxonomy within the Proteobacteria. Int J Syst Bacteriol 40:213–215 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Sawada H., Ieki H., Oyaizu H., Matsumoto S. 1993; Proposal for rejection of Agrobacterium tumefaciens and revised descriptions for the genus Agrobacterium and for Agrobacterium radiobacter and Agrobacterium rhizogenes . Int J Syst Bacteriol 43:694–702 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Skerman V. B. D., McGowan V., Sneath P. H. A. (editors) 1980; Approved lists of bacterial names. Int J Syst Bacteriol 30225–420 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Smith E. F., Townsend C. O. 1907; A plant-tumor of bacterial origin. Science 25:671–673 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Sneath P. H. A. 1984; Bacterial nomenclature. In Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology vol 1 pp  19–23 Edited by Krieg N. R., Holt J. G. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins;
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Stackebrandt E., Frederiksen W., Garrity G. M. 10 other authors 2002; Report of the ad hoc committee for the re-evaluation of the species definition in bacteriology. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52:1043–1047 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Wayne L. G., Brenner D. J., Colwell R. R. 9 other authors 1987; Report of the ad hoc committee on the reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Bacteriol 37:463–464 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Young J. M., Kuykendall L. D., Martínez-Romero E., Kerr A., Sawada H. 2001; A revision of Rhizobium Frank 1889, with an emended description of the genus, and the inclusion of all species of Agrobacterium Conn 1942 and Allorhizobium undicola de Lajudie et al . 1998 as new combinations: Rhizobium radiobacter , R. rhizogenes , R. rubi , R.undicola and R. vitis . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 51:89–103
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Young J. M., Kerr A., Sawada H. 2005; Genus Agrobacterium Conn 1942, 359AL . In The Proteobacteria, Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology , 2nd edn. vol 2 pp  340–345 Edited by Brenner D. J., Krieg N. R., Staley J. T., Garrity G. New York: Springer;
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijs.0.64030-0
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error