The nomenclatural type of the genus Methanocorpusculum Zellner et al. 1988 and the selection of the correct name

References

1. Asakawa S., Nagaoka K. 2003; Methanoculleus bourgensis, Methanoculleus olentangyi and Methanoculleus oldenburgensis are subjective synonyms. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 53:1551–1552 [View Article][PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
2. Boone D. R., Whitman W. B., Rouvière P. 1993; Diversity and taxonomy of methanogens. In Methanogenesis; Ecology, Physiology, Biochemistry and Genetics pp. 36–80 Edited by Ferry J. G. New York: Chapman & Hall;
   [Google Scholar]
3. Chong S. C., Boone D. R. 2001; Genus I. Methanocorpusculum Zellner, Alten, Stackebrandt, Conway de Macario and Winter 1987, 136^VP (Effective publication: Zellner, Alten, Stackebrandt, Conway de Macario and Winter 1987, 18) emend. Xun, Boone and Mah 1989, 110. In Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, 2nd edn. vol. 1 The Archaea and the Deeply Branching and Phototrophic Bacteria pp. 262–264 Edited by Boone D. R., Castenholz R. W., Garrity G. M. New York: Springer;
   [Google Scholar]
4. Garcia J.-L., Ollivier B., Whitman W. B. 2006; The order Methanomicrobiales. In The Prokaryotes: A Handbook on the Biology of Bacteria, 3rd edn. vol. 3 pp. 208–230 Edited by Dworkin M., Falkow S., Rosenberg E., Schleifer K. H., Stackebrandt E. New York: Springer;
   [Google Scholar]
5. Lindström K., Young J. P. W. 2011; International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes. Subcommittee on the taxonomy of Agrobacterium and Rhizobium. minutes of the meeting, 7 septermber 2010, Geneva, Switzerland. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 61:3089–3093 [CrossRef]
   [Google Scholar]
6. Losey N. A., Stevenson B. S., Verbarg S., Rudd S., Moore E. R., Lawson P. A. 2013; Fontimonas thermophila gen. nov., sp. nov., a moderately thermophilic bacterium isolated from a freshwater hot spring, and proposal of Solimonadaceae fam. nov. to replace Sinobacteraceae Zhou et al. 2008. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 63:254–259 [View Article][PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
7. Ollivier B. M., Mah R. A., Garcia J. L., Robinson R. 1985; Isolation and characterization of Methanogenium aggregans sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 35:127–130 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
8. Oren A., Garrity G. M. 2015; The correct name of the type species of the genus Methanocorpusculum. Request for an Opinion. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 65:2013–2014 [View Article][PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
9. Parker C. T., Tindall B. J., Garrity G. M. 2015; International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol Published Ahead of Print:20 November, 2015. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.000778 [View Article][PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
10. Tindall B. J. 2008; Rule 15 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria: a current source of confusion. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 58:1775–1778 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
11. Tindall B. J. 2014a; The family name Solimonadaceae Losey, et al. 2013 is illegitimate, proposals to create the names ‘Sinobacter soli’ comb. nov. and ‘Sinobacter variicoloris’ contravene the code, the family name Xanthomonadaceae Saddler and Bradbury 2005 and the order name Xanthomonadales Saddler and Bradbury 2005 are illegitimate and notes on the application of the family names Solibacteraceae Zhou et al. 2008, Nevskiaceae Henrici and Johnson 1935 (Approved Lists 1980) and Lysobacteraceae Christensen and Cook 1978 (Approved Lists 1980) and order name Lysobacteriales Christensen and Cook 1978 (Approved Lists 1980) with respect to the classification of the corresponding type genera Solibacter Zhou et al. 2008, Nevskia Famintzin 1892 (Approved Lists 1980) and Lysobacter Christensen and Cook 1978 (Approved Lists 1980) and importance of accurately expressing the link between a taxonomic name, its authors and the corresponding description/circumscription/emendation. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 64:293–297 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
12. Tindall B. J. 2014b; Agrobacterium radiobacter (Beijerinck and van Delden 1902) Conn 1942 has priority over Agrobacterium tumefaciens (Smith and Townsend 1907) Conn 1942 when the two are treated as members of the same species based on the principle of priority and Rule 23a, No. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 64:3590–3592 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
13. Tindall B. J. 2015a; Updating rule 15 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol 65:2766–2768 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
14. Tindall B. J. 2015b; A commentary on the interpretation of the International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 65:2334–2336 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
15. Whitman W. B., Lawson P. A., Losey N. A. 2015; Response to Tindall (2014) on the legitimacy of the names Solimonadaceae Losey et al. 2013, Xanthomonadaceae Saddler and Bradbury 2005 and Xanthomonadales Saddler and Bradbury 2005. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 65:1086–1087 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
16. Xun L., Boone D. R., Mah R. A. 1989; Deoxyribonucleic acid hybridization study of Methanogenium and Methanocorpusculum species, emendation of the genus Methanocorpusculum, and transfer of Methanogenium aggregans to the genus Methanocorpusculum as Methanocorpusculum aggregans comb. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 39:109–111 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
17. Zellner G., Alten C., Stackebrandt E., Conway de Macario E., Winter J. 1987; Isolation and characterization of Methanocorpusculum parvum, gen. nov., spec. nov., a new tungsten requiring, coccoid methanogen. Arch Microbiol 147:13–20 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
18. Zellner G., Stackebrandt E., Messner P., Tindall B. J., Conway de Macario E., Kneifel H., Sleytr U. B., Winter J. 1989; Methanocorpusculaceae fam. nov., represented by Methanocorpusculum parvum, Methanocorpusculum sinense spec. nov. and Methanocorpusculum bavaricum spec. nov. Arch Microbiol 151:381–390 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]