1887
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
  4. Volume 67, Issue 11
  5. Article

f Lechevalieria rhizosphaerae sp. nov., a novel actinomycete isolated from rhizosphere soil of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and emended description of the genus Lechevalieria

HTML
56.29 Kb
PDF
179.09 Kb
  • Authors: Junwei Zhao1​,† ,  Wenchao Li1​,† ,  Linlin Shi1​ ,  Han Wang1​ ,  Ying Wang1​ ,  Yue Zhao1​ ,  Wensheng Xiang1​,2​ , Xiangjing Wang1​
    • VIEW AFFILIATIONS
    • 1​ 1​Key Laboratory of Agriculture Biological Functional Gene of Heilongjiang Provincial Education Committee, Northeast Agricultural University, No. 59 Mucai Street, Xiangfang District, Harbin 150030, PR China 2​ 2​State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, PR China
  • *Correspondence: Wensheng Xiang [email protected], Xiangjing Wang [email protected]
  • First Published Online: 27 September 2017, International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 67: 4655-4659, doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.002351
  • Subject: New taxa - Actinobacteria
  • Received:
  • Accepted:
  • Cover date:
Preview this:
Free Preview thumbnail Magnify
Zoom in
Zoomout

Lechevalieria rhizosphaerae sp. nov., a novel actinomycete isolated from rhizosphere soil of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and emended description of the genus Lechevalieria, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/ijsem/67/11/4655_ijsem002351-1.gif

  • A novel actinomycete, designated strain NEAU-A2, was isolated from rhizosphere soil of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and characterized using a polyphasic approach. Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene sequences indicated that strain NEAU-A2 should be assigned to the genus Lechevalieria and forms a distinct branch with its closest neighbour Lechevalieria aerocolonigenes DSM 40034 (99.0 %). Moreover, key morphological and chemotaxonomic properties also confirmed the affiliation of strain NEAU-A2 to the genus Lechevalieria . The cell wall contained meso-diaminopimelic acid and the whole-cell hydrolysates were galactose, mannose, rhamnose, glucose and ribose. The polar lipids were diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylmethylethanolamine, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylinositolmannoside and two glycolipids. The predominant menaquinones were MK-9(H4) and MK-9(H6). The major fatty acids were iso-C16 : 0, anteiso-C15 : 0, C16 : 1ω7c and anteiso-C17 : 0. The DNA G+C content was 68.2 mol%. The combination of the DNA–DNA hybridization result and some phenotypic characteristics demonstrated that strain NEAU-A2 could be distinguished from its closest relative. Therefore, it is proposed that strain NEAU-A2 represents a novel species of the genus Lechevalieria , for which the name Lechevalieria rhizosphaerae sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is NEAU-A2 (=CGMCC 4.7405=DSM 104541).

  • †

    These authors contributed equally to this work.

  • The GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ accession number for the 16S rRNA gene sequence of strain NEAU-A2 is KY744941.

  • Four supplementary figures are available with the online Supplementary Material.

© 2017 IUMS | Published by the Microbiology Society

  • 1. Labeda DP, Goodfellow M, Chun J, Zhi XY, Li WJ. Reassessment of the systematics of the suborder Pseudonocardineae: transfer of the genera within the family Actinosynnemataceae Labeda and Kroppenstedt 2000 emend. Zhi et al. 2009 into an emended family Pseudonocardiaceae Embley et al. 1989 emend. Zhi et al. 2009. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61: 1259– 1264 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Labeda DP, Hatano K, Kroppenstedt RM, Tamura T. Revival of the genus Lentzea and proposal for Lechevalieria gen. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2001; 51: 1045– 1050 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Berendsen RL, Pieterse CM, Bakker PA. The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health. Trends Plant Sci 2012; 17: 478– 486 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Bulgarelli D, Schlaeppi K, Spaepen S, Ver Loren van Themaat E, Schulze-Lefert P. Structure and functions of the bacterial microbiota of plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 2013; 64: 807– 838 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Hayakawa M, Nonomura H. Humic acid-vitamin agar, a new medium for the selective isolation of soil actinomycetes. J Ferment Technol 1987; 65: 501– 509 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Shirling EB, Gottlieb D. Methods for characterization of Streptomyces species. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1966; 16: 313– 340 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Waksman SA. The Actinomycetes: A Summary of Current Knowledge New York: Ronald; 1967
    [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Jones KL. Fresh isolates of actinomycetes in which the presence of sporogenous aerial mycelia is a fluctuating characteristic. J Bacteriol 1949; 57: 141– 145 [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Waksman SA. The Actinomycetes. In: Classification, Identification and Descriptions of Genera and Speciesvol. 2 Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1961
    [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Kelly KL. Inter-Society Color Council-National Bureau of Standards Color-Name Charts Illustrated with Centroid Colors Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1964
    [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Jia F, Liu C, Wang X, Zhao J, Liu Q et al. Wangella harbinensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a new member of the family Micromonosporaceae. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2013; 103: 399– 408 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Smibert RM, Krieg NR. Phenotypic characterization. In Gerhardt P, Murray RGE, Wood WA, Krieg NR. (editors) Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1994; pp. 607– 654
    [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Gordon RE, Barnett DA, Handerhan JE, Pang CH-N. Nocardia coeliaca, Nocardia autotrophica, and the nocardin strain. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1974; 24: 54– 63 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Yokota A, Tamura T, Hasegawa T, Huang LH. Catenuloplanes japonicus gen. nov., sp. nov., nom. rev., a new genus of the order Actinomycetales. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1993; 43: 805– 812 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  • 15. McKerrow J, Vagg S, McKinney T, Seviour EM, Maszenan AM et al. A simple HPLC method for analysing diaminopimelic acid diastereomers in cell walls of Gram-positive bacteria. Lett Appl Microbiol 2000; 30: 178– 182 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Lechevalier MP, Lechevalier HA. The chemotaxonomy of actinomycetes. In Dietz A, Thayer DW. (editors) Actinomycete Taxonomy (Special Publication Vol. 6) Arlington: Society of Industrial Microbiology; 1980; pp. 227– 291
    [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Minnikin DE, O'Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods 1984; 2: 233– 241 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Collins MD. Isoprenoid quinone analyses in bacterial classification and identification. In Goodfellow M, Minnikin DE. (editors) Chemical Methods in Bacterial Systematics London: Academic Press; 1985; pp. 267– 284
    [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Wu C, Lu X, Qin M, Wang Y, Ruan J. Analysis of menaquinone compound in microbial cells by HPLC. Microbiology 1989; 16: 176– 178
    [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Gao R, Liu C, Zhao J, Jia F, Yu C et al. Micromonospora jinlongensis sp. nov., isolated from muddy soil in China and emended description of the genus Micromonospora. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2014; 105: 307– 315 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Xiang W, Liu C, Wang X, Du J, Xi L et al. Actinoalloteichus nanshanensis sp. nov., isolated from the rhizosphere of a fig tree (Ficus religiosa). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61: 1165– 1169 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Kim SB, Brown R, Oldfield C, Gilbert SC, Iliarionov S et al. Gordonia amicalis sp. nov., a novel dibenzothiophene-desulphurizing actinomycete. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2000; 50: 2031– 2036 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4: 406– 425 [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17: 368– 376 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 2013; 30: 2725– 2729 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39: 783– 791 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980; 16: 111– 120 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67: 1613– 1617 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Mandel M, Marmur J. Use of ultraviolet absorbance temperature profile for determining the guanine plus cytosine content of DNA. Methods Enzymol 1968; 12B: 195– 206 [Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
  • 30. De Ley J, Cattoir H, Reynaerts A. The quantitative measurement of DNA hybridization from renaturation rates. Eur J Biochem 1970; 12: 133– 142 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Huss VA, Festl H, Schleifer KH. Studies on the spectrophotometric determination of DNA hybridization from renaturation rates. Syst Appl Microbiol 1983; 4: 184– 192 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Thomas EA, Alvarez CE, Sutcliffe JG. Evolutionarily distinct classes of S27 ribosomal proteins with differential mRNA expression in rat hypothalamus. J Neurochem 2000; 74: 2259– 2267 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Wayne LG, Brenner DJ, Colwell RR, Grimont PAD, Kandler O et al. International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology. Report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1987; 37: 463– 464 [Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
http://sgm.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002351
Loading

Supplementary Data

 Data loading....

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002351
2017-09-27
2019-02-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/67/11/4655.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002351&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Author and Article Information

 Figure data loading....

Footnotes:

Validated antibodies in this article

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Please check the format of the address you have entered.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error