1887

Abstract

A novel actinobacterial strain, designated X5, was isolated from the sediment of Taihu Lake in China and was subjected to a polyphasic taxonomic characterization. The strain formed orange–red colonies comprising aerobic, Gram-stain-negative, rod-shaped cells on R2A agar. Phylogenetic analysis based on the 16S rRNA gene sequences revealed that the organism was closely related to the genus and consistently formed a distinct clade along with the members of this genus. The closest phylogenetic neighbour was NBRC 12702 with 93.7 % 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity. The major fatty acids (>10 %) were iso-C (18.7 %), Cω9 (18.6 %) and Cω8 (14.0 %). The genomic DNA G+C content was 74.4 mol%. The organism contained menaquinone MK-8(H), MK-9(H) and an unidentified menaquinone. Polar lipids were composed of phosphatidylglycerol, an unidentified lipid, two unidentified phospholipids and two unidentified aminolipids. The whole-cell sugars contained ribose, xylose, mannose, glucose and galactose. The cell-wall peptidoglycan contained -diaminopimelic acid. Based on the physiological, biochemical and chemotaxonomic data, the organism is proposed to represent a novel genus and species, for which the name gen. nov., sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is X5 (=CGMCC 4.7317=NBRC 112237).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002615
2018-03-01
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/68/3/942.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002615&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Lechevalier MP, Lechevalier HA, Holbert PE. Sporichthya, un nouveau genre de Streptomycetaceae . Ann Inst Pasteur 1968; 114:277–286
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Rainey FA, Schumann P, Prauser H, Toalster R, Stackebrandt E. Sporichthya polymorpha represents a novel line of descent within the order Actinomycetales. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1993; 109:263–267 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Stackebrandt E, Rainey FA, Ward-Rainey NL. Proposal for a new hierarchic classification system, Actinobacteria classis nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1997; 47:479–491 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Tamura T, Hayakawa M, Hatano K. Sporichthya brevicatena sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1999; 49:1779–1784 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Sen A, Daubin V, Abrouk D, Gifford I, Berry AM et al. Phylogeny of the class Actinobacteria revisited in the light of complete genomes. The orders 'Frankiales' and Micrococcales should be split into coherent entities: proposal of Frankiales ord. nov., Geodermatophilales ord. nov., Acidothermales ord. nov. and Nakamurellales ord. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:3821–3832 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Gregersen T. Rapid method for distinction of gram-negative from gram-positive bacteria. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 1978; 5:123–127 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bernardet JF, Nakagawa Y, Holmes B. Proposed minimal standards for describing new taxa of the family Flavobacteriaceae and emended description of the family. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2002; 52:1049–1070 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Dong XZ, Cai MY. Determinative Manual for Routine Bacteriology Beijing: Scientific Press; 2001
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Birnboim HC, Doly J. A rapid alkaline extraction procedure for screening recombinant plasmid DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 1979; 7:1513–1523 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Qu JH, Qu JY, He XB, Li HF, Luo Y et al. Sediminicoccus rosea gen. nov. sp. nov., isolated from the sediment of a eutrophic lake. J Gen Appl Microbiol 2013; 59:463–468[PubMed] [Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25:3389–3402 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Kim OS, Cho YJ, Lee K, Yoon SH, Kim M et al. Introducing EzTaxon-e: a prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene sequence database with phylotypes that represent uncultured species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:716–721 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Myers EW, Miller W. Optimal alignments in linear space. Comput Appl Biosci 1988; 4:11–17 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Rzhetsky A, Nei M. A simple method for estimating and testing minimum evolution trees. Mol Biol Evol 1992; 9:945–967
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016; 33:1870–1874 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 1994; 22:4673–4680 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980; 16:111–120 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Lee SD. Blastococcus jejuensis sp. nov., an actinomycete from beach sediment, and emended description of the genus Blastococcus Ahrens and Moll 1970. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:2391–2396 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Marmur J. A procedure for the isolation of deoxyribonucleic acid from micro-organisms. J Mol Biol 1961; 3:208–218 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Mesbah M, Premachandran U, Whitman WB. Precise measurement of the G+C content of deoxyribonucleic acid by high-performance liquid chromatography. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1989; 39:159–167 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Komagata K, Suzuki K. 4 Lipid and cell-wall analysis in bacterial systematics. Methods Microbiol 1988; 19:161–207 [Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Collins MD. Isoprenoid quinone analyses in bacterial classification and identification. In Goodfellow M, Minnikin DE. (editors) Chemical Methods in Bacterial Systematics London: Academic Press; 1985 pp. 267–284
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Lechevalier HA, Lechevalier MP. The Chemotaxonomy of Actinomycetes. In Dietz A, Theayer W. (editors) Actinomycetes Taxonomy Special Publication No.6 Arlington, VA: Society for Industrial Microbiology; 1980 pp. 227–291
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Hasegawa T, Takizawa M, Tanida S. A rapid analysis for chemical grouping of aerobic actinomycetes. J Gen Appl Microbiol 1983; 29:319–322 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002615
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002615
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary File 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error