1887

Abstract

A Gram-stain-negative, non-motile, oxidase- and catalase-positive, rod-shaped bacterium was isolated from a coastal seawater sample from the Arctic Circle and designated strain IMCC9719. On the basis of 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis, it was shown that strain IMCC9719 belonged to the genus Leucothrix and was closely related to the type strains of Leucothrix pacifica (97.6 % similarity) and Leucothrix mucor (95.1 %), while the strain shared <90.6 % sequence similarity with other bacterial species. The average nucleotide identity and genome-to-genome distance values between strain IMCC9719 and L. pacifica JCM 18388 were 71.7 and 16.9 %, respectively. The DNA G+C content of strain IMCC9719 was 43.5 mol%. Optimum growth of strain IMCC9719 was observed at 15 °C, at pH 7.5–8.5 and in the presence of 2.0–2.5 % (w/v) NaCl. The major fatty acids were summed feature 3 (C16 : 1 ω7c and/or C16 : 1ω6c), summed feature 8 (C18 : 1 ω6c and/or C18 : 1 ω7c) and C16 : 0. Cells of strain IMCC9719 contained diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine, an unidentified polar lipid, an unidentified aminophospholipid and two unidentified phospholipids. The major respiratory quinone was ubiquinone-8 (Q-8). Based on the taxonomic data collected in this study, strain IMCC9719 represents a novel species of the genus Leucothrix , for which the name Leucothrix arctica sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is IMCC9719 (=KACC 18010=NBRC 110382).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003072
2018-12-04
2024-04-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/68/12/3851.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003072&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Öersted AS. De regionibus marinis, elementa topographiae historiconaturalis freti Oeresund. Inaug. Diss. J. C. Scharling, Copenhagen 1844
  2. Boden R, Scott KM. Evaluation of the genus Thiothrix Winogradsky 1888 (Approved Lists 1980) emend. Aruga et al. 2002: reclassification of Thiothrix disciformis to Thiolinea disciformis gen. nov., comb. nov., and of Thiothrix flexilis to Thiofilum flexile gen. nov., comb nov., with emended description of Thiothrix. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:2226–2239 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bland JA, Brock TD. The marine bacterium Leucothrix mucor as an algal epiphyte. Mar Biol 1973; 23:283–292 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhang Z, Gao X, Wang L, Zhang XH. Leucothrix pacifica sp. nov., isolated from seawater, and emended description of the genus Leucothrix. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:2397–2402 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Lane DJ. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In Stackebrandt E, Goodfellow M. (editors) Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics New York: John Wiley Sons; 1991 pp. 115–147
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Pruesse E, Peplies J, Glöckner FO. SINA: accurate high-throughput multiple sequence alignment of ribosomal RNA genes. Bioinformatics 2012; 28:1823–1829 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016; 33:1870–1874 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Jukes TH, Cantor CR. Evolution of protein molecules. In Munro HN. (editor) Mammalian Protein Metabolism New York: Academic Press; 1969 pp. 21–132
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Fitch WM. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst Zool 1971; 20:406–416 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Stackebrandt E, Goebel BM. Taxonomic Note: a place for DNA-DNA reassociation and 16S rRNA sequence analysis in the present species definition in bacteriology. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1994; 44:846–849 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P et al. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:81–91 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Auch AF, von Jan M, Klenk HP, Göker M. Digital DNA-DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison. Stand Genomic Sci 2010; 2:117–134 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Rosselló-Mora R, Amann R. The species concept for prokaryotes. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2001; 25:39–67 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Choo YJ, Lee K, Song J, Cho JC. Puniceicoccus vermicola gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel marine bacterium, and description of Puniceicoccaceae fam. nov., Puniceicoccales ord. nov., Opitutaceae fam. nov., Opitutales ord. nov. and Opitutae classis nov. in the phylum 'Verrucomicrobia'. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:532–537 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Smibert RM, Krieg NR. Phenotypic characteristics. In Gerhardt P, Murray RGE, Wood WA, Krieg NR. (editors) Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1994 pp. 607–654
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Tindall BJ, Sikorski J, Smibert RM, Kreig NR. Phenotypic characterization and the principles of comparative systematics. In Reddy CA, Beveridge TJ, Breznak JA, Marzluf G, Schmidt TM et al. (editors) Methods for General and Molecular Microbiology, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: ASM Press; 2007 pp. 330–393
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Sasser M. Bacterial Identification by Gas Chromatographic Analysis of Fatty Acids methyl Esters (GC-FAME) Newark: Microbial ID Inc; 2006
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Minnikin DE, O'Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods 1984; 2:233–241 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Collins MD. Analysis of isoprenoid quinones. Methods Microbiol 1985; 18:329–363
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Komagata K, Suzuki K. Lipid and cell-wall analysis in bacterial systematics. Methods Microbiol 1987; 19:161–207
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003072
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003072
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary File 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error