An analysis of the term 'standing in nomenclature', as used in the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes

References

1. Parker CT, Tindall BJ, Garrity GM. International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015 In press https://dx.doi.org/ [View Article][PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
2. Lapage SP, Sneath PHA, Lessel EF, Skerman VBD, Seeliger HPR et al. (editors) International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria (1975 Revision). Bacteriological Code Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1975
   [Google Scholar]
3. Lapage SP, Sneath PHA, Lessel EF, Skerman VBD, Seeliger HPR, Clark WA. (editors) International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria (1990 Revision). Bacteriological Code Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1992
   [Google Scholar]
4. Buchanan RE, St John-Brooks R. Proposed Bacteriological Code of Nomenclature. Developed from proposals approved by the International Committee on Bacteriological Nomenclature at the meeting of the Third International Congress for Microbiology. Publication authorized in Plenary Session Ames, Iowa: The Iowa State College Press; 1947
   [Google Scholar]
5. Buchanan RE, St John-Brooks R, Breed RS. International bacteriological code of nomenclature. J Bacteriol 1948; 55:287–306[PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
6. Buchanan RE, St John-Brooks R, Breed RS. International bacteriological code of nomenclature. Reprinted from J Bacteriol 55;287–306 (1948). J Gen Microbiol 1949; 3:444–462
   [Google Scholar]
7. Editorial Board of the International Committee on Bacteriological Nomenclature International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria and Viruses: Bacteriological Code Ames Ames, Iowa: Iowa State College Press; 1958
   [Google Scholar]
8. Editorial Board. International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria (1966 Revision). Int J Syst Bacteriol 1966; 16:459–490
   [Google Scholar]
9. Skerman VBD, McGowan V, Sneath PHA. 1980. Approved Lists of Bacterial Names. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1980; 30:225–420 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
10. Judicial Commission Invalidity of the Bacterial Generic Name Müllerina de Petschenko 1910 and of the Species Name Müllerina Paramecii. Opinion 10. Int Bull Bacteriol Nomen Taxon 1954; 4:147–148
    [Google Scholar]
11. Judicial Commission Rejection of the generic name Arthrobacter Fischer 1895 and conservation of the generic name Arthrobacter Conn and Dimmick 1947. Opinion 24. Int Bull Bacteriol Nomen Taxon 1958; 8:171–172
    [Google Scholar]
12. Editorial Board (for the Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Bacteriological Nomenclature) Rejection of Names of Bacteria in Certain Publications of Trécul, Hallier, Billroth, and Ogston. Opinion 25. Int Bull Bacteriol Nomen Taxon 1963; 13:33–35
    [Google Scholar]