1887

Abstract

A novel actinomycete strain, designated CFH S0054, was isolated from a soil sample collected from Xiaokongshan in Tengchong, Yunnan Province, in south-west PR China. Phylogenetic analysis based on its 16S rRNA gene sequence indicated that strain CFH S0054 belonged to the genus . Based on the results of 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis, strain CFH S0054 was most closely related to IFM 0354 (98.3 %), NBRC 100128 (97.9 %), NBRC 14405 (97.9 %) and CFH S0067 (97.8 %). Strain CFH S0054 contained C, C ω9, C 10-methyl (TBSA) and summed feature 3 as major cellular fatty acids and MK-8 (H4ω-cycl) as the major respiratory quinone. The polar lipid profile included phosphatidylethanolamine, diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylinositol, phosphatidylinositol mannoside and unknown phospholipids. The cell wall contained -diaminopimelic acid, and the whole-cell hydrolysates were arabinose, galactose, glucose, fructose, ribose and mannose. The genome of strain CFH S0054 was 7.9 Mbp with a G+C content of 68.4 mol%, the average nucleotide identity (ANI) values between strain CFH S0054 and IFM0354 were low (ANIm<87.7 % and ANIb=84.1 %). On the basis of phylogenetic, physiological and chemotaxonomic data, strain CFHS0054 is considered to represent a novel species of the genus , for which the name sp. nov. is proposed, The type strain is CFH S0054 (DSM 46763=JCM 30082).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003600
2019-10-01
2024-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/69/10/3116.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003600&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Trevisan V. I Generi e le Specie delle Batteriacee. Zanaboni & Gabuzzi, Milan 1889p.-34
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Huang JR, Ming H, Duan YY, Li S, Zhang LY et al. Nocardia heshunensis sp nov., an actinomycete isolated from soil,. Int J Syst Evol Micr 2017; 67:3467–3473
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Li S, Ming H, Duan YY, Huang JR, Zhao ZL et al. Nocardia tengchongensis sp. nov., isolated from a soil sample. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:1149–1155 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Goodfellow M, Isik K, Yates E. Actinomycete systematics: an unfinished synthesis. Nova Acta Leopold 1999; 312:47–82
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol 1991; 173:697–703 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 2013; 30:2725–2729 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25:4876–4882 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Fitch WM. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst Zool 1971; 20:406–416
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1985; 17:368–376
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980; 16:111–120[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Ezak T, Hashimoto Y, Yabuuchi E. Fluorometric deoxyribonucleic acid–deoxyribonucleic acid hybridization in microdilution wells as an alternative to membrane filter hybridization in which radioisotopes are used to determine genetic relatedness among bacterial strains. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1989; 39:224–229
    [Google Scholar]
  15. He L, Li W, Huang Y, Wang L, Liu Z et al. Streptomyces jietaisiensis sp. nov., isolated from soil in northern China. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55:1939–1944 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Luo R, Liu B, Xie Y, Li Z, Huang W et al. SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler. Gigascience 2012; 1:18 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Freel KC, Sarilar V, Neuvéglise C et al. Genome Sequence of the Yeast Cyberlindnera fabianii (Hansenula fabianii). Genome Announcements 2014; 2:1–2
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Delcher AL. Glimmer Release Notes Version 3.02; 2006
  19. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M, Spröer C, Klenk HP. When should a DDH experiment be mandatory in microbial taxonomy?. Arch Microbiol 2013; 195:413–418 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Wayne LG, Brenner DJ, Colwell RR, Grimont PAD, Kandler O et al. International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology. Report of the ad hoc Committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1987; 37:463–464
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Shirling EB, Gottlieb D. Methods for characterization of Streptomyces species. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1966; 16:313–340
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Waksman SA. The Actinomycetes. A Summary of Current Knowledge New York: Ronald Press; 1967
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Doetsch RN. Determinative methods of light microscopy. In Gerhardt P, Murray RGE, Costilow RN, Nester EW, Wood WA et al. (editors) Manual of Methods for General Bacteriology Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1981 pp. 21–33
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Gordon RE. The taxonomy of soil bacteria. In Gray TRG, Parkinson D. (editors) The Ecology of Soil Bacteria Liverpool University Press: Liverpool; 1967 pp. 293–321
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kovacs N. Identification of Pseudomonas pyocyanea by the oxidase reaction. Nature 1956; 178:703 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Gordon RE, Barnett DA, Handerhan JE, Pang CH-N. Nocardia coeliaca, Nocardia autotrophica, and the nocardin strain. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1974; 24:54–63
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Goodfellow M. Numerical taxonomy of some nocardioform bacteria. J Gen Microbiol 1971; 69:33–80 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Williams ST, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Wellington EM, Sneath PH et al. Numerical classification of Streptomyces and related genera. J Gen Microbiol 1983; 129:1743–1813 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Smibert RM, Krieg NR. Phenotypic characterization. In Gerhardt P, Murray RGE, Woods WA, Krieg NR. (editors) Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1994 pp. 607–654
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Xie CH, Yokota A. Phylogenetic analyses of Lampropedia hyalina based on the 16S rRNA gene sequence. J Gen Appl Microbiol 2003; 49:345–349[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Sasser M. Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids, MIDI Technical Note 101. Newark, DE: MIDI Inc; 1990
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Tindall BJ. Lipid composition of Halobacterium lacusprofundi . FEMS Microbiol Lett 1990; 66:199–202
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Lechevalier MP. &Lechevalier HA, Composition of whole cell hydrolysates as a criterion in the classification of aerobic actinomycetes . In Prauser H. (editor) The Actinomycetales Jena: VEB Gustav Fisher Verlag; 1970 pp. 311–316
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Minnikin DE, Hutchinson IG, Caldicott AB, Goodfellow M. Thin-layer chromatography of methanolysates of mycolic acid-containing bacteria. J Chromatogr 1980; 188:221–233
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Kageyama A, Yazawa K, Taniguchi H, Chibana H, Nishimura K et al. Nocardia concava sp. nov., isolated from Japanese patients. Int J Syst Evol Micr 2005; 55:2081–2083 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003600
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003600
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary File 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error