1887

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY logo

Volume 69, Issue 10

sp. nov., isolated from a large freshwater lake Free

Abstract

A Gram-staining-negative, aerobic, motile with a single polar flagellum and rod-shaped bacterium as a bacterial host of podovirus P26218, designated IMCC26218, was isolated from Lake Soyang, South Korea. Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene sequences revealed that strain IMCC26218 belonged to the genus of the family and shared 97.7–99.0 % sequence similarities with species. The draft whole genome sequence of strain IMCC26218 was ca. 4.9 Mbp in size with the DNA G+C content of 62.3 mol%. Average nucleotide identity (ANI) and digital DNA–DNA hybridisation (dDDH) values between strain IMCC26218 and other were 74.0–77.3 % and 19.5–21.0 %, respectively, showing that the strain represents a new species. The strain contained summed feature 3 (C 6 and/or C 7) and C as the major fatty acids and phosphatidylethanolamine, three unidentified phospholipids, two unidentified aminolipids and two unidentified lipids as major polar lipids. The predominant isoprenoid quinone of the strain was ubiquinone-8 (Q-8). On the basis of the phylogenetic and phenotypic characteristics, strain IMCC26218 is considered to represent a novel species of the genus , for which the name sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is IMCC26218 (=KACC 18983=NBRC 112709).

  • Received:
  • Accepted:
  • Published Online:
Keyword(s): freshwater , genome , Rhodoferax , Rhodoferax lacus and taxonomy
© 2019 The Authors
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003602
2019-10-01
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/69/10/3135.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003602&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Casas V, Rohwer F. Phage metagenomics. Methods Enzymol 2007; 421:259–268 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Rodriguez-Brito B, Li L, Wegley L, Furlan M, Angly F et al. Viral and microbial community dynamics in four aquatic environments. ISME J 2010; 4:739–751 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Guidi L, Chaffron S, Bittner L, Eveillard D, Larhlimi A. Tara Oceans coordinators et al. Plankton networks driving carbon export in the oligotrophic ocean. Nature 2016; 532:465–470 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Yu P, Mathieu J, Li M, Dai Z, Alvarez PJ. Isolation of polyvalent bacteriophages by sequential multiple-host approaches. Appl Environ Microbiol 2016; 82:808–815 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Edwards RA, Rohwer F. Viral metagenomics. Nat Rev Microbiol 2005; 3:504–510 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Moon K, Kang I, Kim S, Cho JC, Kim SJ. Complete genome sequence of bacteriophage P26218 infecting Rhodoferax sp. strain IMCC26218. Stand Genomic Sci 2015; 10:111 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Moon K, Kang I, Kim S, Kim SJ, Cho JC. Genome characteristics and environmental distribution of the first phage that infects the LD28 clade, a freshwater methylotrophic bacterial group. Environ Microbiol 2017; 19:4714–4727 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Moon K, Kang I, Kim S, Kim SJ, Cho JC. Genomic and ecological study of two distinctive freshwater bacteriophages infecting a Comamonadaceae bacterium. Sci Rep 2018; 8:7989 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Hiraishi A, Hoshino Y, Satoh T. Rhodoferax fermentans gen. nov., sp. nov., a phototrophic purple nonsulfur bacterium previously referred to as the ?Rhodocyclus gelatinosus-like? group. Arch Microbiol 1991; 155:330–336 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Federhen S. The NCBI taxonomy database. Nucleic Acids Res 2012; 40:D136–D143 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Farh ME, Kim YJ, Singh P, Jung SY, Kang JP et al. Rhodoferax koreense sp. nov, an obligately aerobic bacterium within the family Comamonadaceae, and emended description of the genus Rhodoferax . J Microbiol 2017; 55:767–774 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Kaden R, Spröer C, Beyer D, Krolla-Sidenstein P. Rhodoferax saidenbachensis sp. nov., a psychrotolerant, very slowly growing bacterium within the family Comamonadaceae, proposal of appropriate taxonomic position of Albidiferax ferrireducens strain T118T in the genus Rhodoferax and emended description of the genus Rhodoferax. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:1186–1193 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Jeon HT, Joung Y, Kim S, Lim Y, Cho JC. A report on 17 unrecorded bacterial species in Korea isolated from lake Soyang and Chungju in 2016. J Spec Res 2017; 6:163–170
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Joung Y, Jang HJ, Park M, Song J, Cho JC. Pedobacter aquicola sp. nov., isolated from freshwater. J Microbiol 2018; 56:478–484 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Joung Y, Jang HJ, Song J, Cho JC. Flavobacterium aquariorum sp. nov., isolated from freshwater of the North Han River. J Microbiol 2019; 57:343–349 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Gupta SK, Shin H, Han D, Hur HG, Unno T. Metagenomic analysis reveals the prevalence and persistence of antibiotic- and heavy metal-resistance genes in wastewater treatment plant. J Microbiol 2018; 56:408–415 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Kim DW, Lee K, Lee DH, Cha CJ. Comparative genomic analysis of pyrene-degrading Mycobacterium species: Genomic islands and ring-hydroxylating dioxygenases involved in pyrene degradation. J Microbiol 2018; 56:798–804 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Connon SA, Giovannoni SJ. High-throughput methods for culturing microorganisms in very-low-nutrient media yield diverse new marine isolates. Appl Environ Microbiol 2002; 68:3878–3885 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol 1991; 173:697–703 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Ludwig W, Strunk O, Westram R, Richter L, Meier H et al. ARB: a software environment for sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32:1363–1371 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for Bigger Datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016; 33:1870–1874 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Fitch WM. Toward Defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst Biol 1971; 20:406–416 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 2014; 30:2114–2120 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 2012; 19:455–477 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Lee I, Ouk Kim Y, Park SC, Chun J. OrthoANI: An improved algorithm and software for calculating average nucleotide identity. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:1100–1103 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 2014; 30:2068–2069 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Marchler-Bauer A, Zheng C, Chitsaz F, Derbyshire MK, Geer LY et al. CDD: conserved domains and protein three-dimensional structure. Nucleic Acids Res 2013; 41:D348–D352 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P et al. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:81–91 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Kim M, Oh HS, Park SC, Chun J. Towards a taxonomic coherence between average nucleotide identity and 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity for species demarcation of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:346–351 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Wolfe AJ, Berg HC. Migration of bacteria in semisolid agar. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1989; 86:6973–6977 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Tindall BJ, Sikorski J, Smibert RA, Krieg NR. Phenotypic characterization and the principles of comparative systematics. In Reddy CA, Beveridge TJ, Breznak JA, Marzluf G, Schmidt TM et al. (editors) Methods for General and Molecular Microbiology, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: American Society of Microbiology; 2007 pp. 330–393
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Sasser M. Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids, MIDI Technical Note 101. Newark: DE: MIDI Inc; 1990
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Minnikin DE, O'Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods 1984; 2:233–241 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Collins MD, Jones D. A note on the separation of natural mixtures of bacterial ubiquinones using reverse‐phase partition thin‐layer chromatography and high performance liquid chromatography. J Appl Microbiol 1981; 51:129–134
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003602
Loading
Rhodoferax lacus sp. nov., isolated from a large freshwater lake
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 69, 3135 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.003602
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003602
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003602
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary File 1

PDF

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error