1887

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY logo

Volume 40, Issue 2

Restriction Endonuclease Patterns and Multivariate Analysis as a Classification Tool for spp. Free

Abstract

Three and seven strains were studied by using restriction endonuclease analysis (REA) combined with principal-component analysis (PCA) and soft independent modeling of class analogy (SIMCA). Chromosomal DNAs from the strains were extracted and cleaved with restriction enzymes, and the DNA fragments were separated according to size by agarose gel electrophoresis. Band patterns were read by using a laser densitometer. The procedure to obtain reproducible digestion patterns with a suitable number of DNA fragments was optimized. 718, I and RI were the most suitable of the 17 restriction enzymes tested, each giving 30 to 50 DNA fragments down to a molecular weight of 4.2 × 10. The digestion patterns of all three enzymes, which gave a data set for 10 strains and 80 variables, were used for classification by PCA and SIMCA. All strains were clearly separated, and the separation within each species was in general accordance with data on DNA-DNA homology found in the literature. A class model was created for 1073, 1068, 1063, 1048, and 1044. Closest to this model was DSM 20016 (T = type strain), followed by DSM 20015; the most distant strains were the strains. We concluded that restriction endonuclease analysis, combined with PCA and SIMCA, can be used for the classification of spp.

  • Published Online:
Copyright © 1990 International Union of Microbiological Societies
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-40-2-189
1990-04-01
2024-05-01
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/40/2/ijsem-40-2-189.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-40-2-189&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Axelsson L., Lindgren S. 1987; Characterization and DNA homology of Lactobacillus strains isolated from pig intestine. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 62:433–440
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Bauer W., Vinograd J. 1968; The interaction of closed circular DNA with intercalative dyes. I. The superhelix density of SV 40 DNA in the presence and absence of dye. J. Mol. Biol. 33:141–171
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bjorvatn B., Lund V., Kristiansen B.-E., Korsnes L., Spanne O., Lindqvist B. 1984; Applications of restriction endonuclease fingerprinting of chromosomal DNA of Neisseria meningitidis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 19:763–765
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Blomquist G., Johansson E., Söderström B., Wold S. 1979; Classification of fungi by means of pyrolysis-gas chromatography-pattern recognition. J. Chromatogr. 173:19–32
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Borch E., Molin G. 1988; Numerical taxonomy of psychrotrophic lactic acid bacteria from prepacked meat and meat products. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek J. Microbiol. Serol. 54:301–323
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bradbury W. C., Murray R. G. E., Mancini C., Morris V. L. 1985; Bacterial chromosomal restriction endonuclease analysis of the homology of Bacteroides species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 21:24–28
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bradbury W. C., Pearson A. D., Marko M. A., Congi R. V., Penner J. L. 1984; Investigation of a Campylobacter jejuni outbreak by serotyping and chromosomal restriction endonuclease analysis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 19:342–346
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Collins D. M., De Lisle G. W. 1985; DNA restriction endonuclease analysis of Mycobacterium bovis and other members of the tuberculosis complex. J. Clin. Microbiol. 21:562564
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Crameri R., Hintermann G., Hutter R. 1983; Deoxyribonucleic acid restriction endonuclease fingerprint characterization of actinomycete strains. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 33:652–655
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Dellaglio F., Bottazi V., Vescovo M. 1975; Deoxyribbonucleic acid homology among Lactobacillus species of the subgenus Streptobacterium Orla Jensen. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 25:160–172
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Efthymion C., Hansen P. A. 1962; An antigenic analysis of Lactobacillus acidophilus. J. Infect. Dis. 110:258–267
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Garcia M. J., Tabaris E. 1986; Separation of Mycobacterium gadium from other rapidly growing mycobacteria on the basis of DNA homology and restriction endonuclease analysis. J. Gen. Microbiol. 132:2265–2269
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Hathaway S. C., Marshall R. B., Little T. W. A., Headlam S. A., Winter P. J. 1985; Identification by cross-agglutination absorption and restriction endonuclease analysis of leptospires of the Pomona serogroup isolated in the United Kingdom. Res. Vet. Sci. 39:151–156
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Jolliffe I. T. 1986 Principal component analysis. SpringerVerlag; New York:
     [Google Scholar]
  15. London J., Chace N. M. 1983; Relationships among lactic acid bacteria demonstrated with glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase as an evolutionary probe. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 33:723–737
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Manachini P. L., Parini C. 1983; DNA-restriction endonuclease cleavage patterns, DNA sequence similarity and phenotypical characteristics in some strains of Lactobacillus helveticus and Lactobacillus jugurti. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek J. Microbiol. Serol. 49:143–152
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Marschall R. B., Wilton B. E., Robinson A. J. 1981; Identification of leptospira serovars by restriction-endonuclease analysis. J. Med. Microbiol. 14:163–166
     [Google Scholar]
  18. O’Hara M. J., Collins D. M., DeLisle G. W. 1985; Restriction endonuclease analysis of Brucella ovis and other Brucella species. Vet. Microbiol. 10:425–429
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Priest F. G., Barbour E. A. 1985 Numerical taxonomy of lactic acid bacteria and some related taxa. 137–163 Goodfellow M., Jones D., Priest F. G.ed Computer-assisted bacterial systematics Academic Press, Inc. (London), Ltd.; London:
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Razin S., Harasawa R., Barile M. F. 1983; Cleavage patterns of the mycoplasma chromosome, obtained by using restriction endonucleases as indicators of genetic relatedness among strains. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 33:201–206
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Razin S., Tully J. G., Rose D. L., Barile M. F. 1983; DNA cleavage patterns as indicators of genotypic heterogeneity among strains of Acholeplasma and Mycoplasma species. J. Gen. Microbiol. 129:1935–1944
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Regnery R. L., Tzianabos T., Esposito J. J., McDade J. E. 1983; Strain differention of epidemic typhus rickettsiae (Rickettsia prowazekii) by DNA restriction endonuclease analysis. Curr. Microbiol. 8:355–358
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Schleifer K. H., Kraus J., Dvorak C., Kilpper-Bälz R., Collins M. D., Fischer W. 1985; Transfer of Streptococcus lactis and related streptococci to the genus Lactococcus gen. nov. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 6:183–195
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Sorensen B., Falk E. S., Wissloff-Nilsen E., Bjorvatn B., Kristiansen B. E. 1985; Multivariate analysis of Neisseria DNA restriction endonuclease patterns. J. Gen. Microbiol. 131:30993104
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Stackebrandt E., Fowler V. J., Woese C. R. 1983; A phylogenetic analysis of lactobacilli, Pediococcus pentosaceus and Leuconostoc mesenteroides. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 4:326–337
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Verger J. M., Grimont F., Grimont P. A. D., Grayon M. 1987; Taxonomy of the genus Brucella. Ann. Inst. Pasteur (Paris) 138:235–238
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Wold S. 1976; Pattern recognition by means of disjoint principal components models. Pattern Recogn. 8:127–139
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-40-2-189
Loading
Restriction Endonuclease Patterns and Multivariate Analysis as a Classification Tool for Lactobacillus spp.
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 40, 189 (1990); https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-40-2-189
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-40-2-189
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-40-2-189
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error