1887

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY logo

Volume 69, Issue 9

sp. nov., isolated from a river Free

Abstract

A facultatively anaerobic and Gram-stain-negative bacterium, strain GY_G, was isolated from a river (Daedeock-cheon) in Daejeon, Republic of Korea. The isolate was catalase-positive, oxidase-positive and formed yellow colonies. Strain GY_G was phylogenetically classified as belonging in the genus . Its closely related strains were 03SU3-P (97.1 % similarity), T5 (96.9 %), JC216 (96.5 %), 01SU5-P (96.5 %) and G1A_585 (96.3 %) based on 16S rRNA gene sequences. The growth conditions for GY_G were at 10–45 °C (optimum, 25 °C), pH 6–10 (pH 7) and 0–4% NaCl (0.5–1.5 %). Strain GY_G could utilize turanose, -fructose-6-phosphate, glucuronamide, -keto-glutaric acid and acetoacetic acid. The major fatty acids of strain GY_G were summed features 8 (C 7/C 6; 40.6 %) and 3 (C 6/C 7; 24.7 %). The major quinone required for respiration was Q-10. The polar lipids of strain GY_G were diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine and sphingolipid. The G+C content of the genome was 57.7 mol%. The average nucleotide identity and average amino acid identity values between strains GY_G and were 71.0 and 72.7 %, respectively. Based on phylogenetic and phenotypic attributes, we suggest that strain GY_G is a novel species in the genus and propose the name . The type strain is GY_G (=KCTC 62791=JCM 32855).

  • Received:
  • Accepted:
  • Published Online:
Keyword(s): aromatic compounds and Sphingorhabdus
© 2019 IUMS
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003503
2019-09-01
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/69/9/2644.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003503&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Jogler M, Chen H, Simon J, Rohde M, Busse HJ et al. Description of Sphingorhabdus planktonica gen. nov., sp. nov. and reclassification of three related members of the genus Sphingopyxis in the genus Sphingorhabdus gen. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:1342–1349 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Yang SZ, Xiong X, Feng GD, Li HP, Zhu HH. Reclassification of Sphingopyxis contaminans as Sphingorhabdus contaminans comb. nov. and emended description of the genus Sphingorhabdus . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:4328–4331 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Park JM, Park S, Jung YT, Kim H, Lee JS et al. Sphingorhabdus arenilitoris sp. nov., isolated from a coastal sand, and reclassification of Sphingopyxis rigui as Sphingorhabdus rigui comb. nov. and Sphingopyxis wooponensis as Sphingorhabdus wooponensis comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:2551–2557 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Yoon JH, Oh TK, Tk O. Sphingopyxis flavimaris sp. nov., isolated from sea water of the Yellow Sea in Korea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55:369–373 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Kim BS, Lim YW, Chun J. Sphingopyxis marina sp. nov. and Sphingopyxis litoris sp. nov., isolated from seawater. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008; 58:2415–2419 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Parte AC. LPSN - List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (bacterio.net), 20 years on. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:1825–1829 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Tschech A, Pfennig N. Growth yield increase linked to caffeate reduction in Acetobacterium woodii . Arch Microbiol 1984; 137:163–167 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Smith EJ, Davison W, Hamilton-Taylor J. Methods for preparing synthetic freshwaters. Water Res 2002; 36:1286–1296 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Widdel F, Bak F. Gram-negative mesophilic sulfate-reducing bacteria. The Prokaryotes Springer; 1992 pp. 3352–3378
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Lane D. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics 1991115–175
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol 1991; 173:697–703 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016; 33:1870–1874 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Luo R, Liu B, Xie Y, Li Z, Huang W et al. SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler. Gigascience 2012; 1:18 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Burall LS, Grim CJ, Mammel MK, Datta AR. Whole genome sequence analysis using JSpecies tool establishes clonal relationships between Listeria monocytogenes strains from epidemiologically unrelated listeriosis outbreaks. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0150797 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Konstantinidis KT, Ramette A, Tiedje JM. The bacterial species definition in the genomic era. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2006; 361:1929–1940 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Konstantinidis KT, Tiedje JM. Towards a genome-based taxonomy for prokaryotes. J Bacteriol 2005; 187:6258–6264 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  19. van Eck G-R. Physiological and chemical tests for drinking water. NEN 1056: Nederlands Normalisatie Institut Rijswijk 1966
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Hood-Nowotny R, Umana NH-N, Inselbacher E, Oswald- Lachouani P, Wanek W. Alternative methods for measuring inorganic, organic, and total dissolved nitrogen in soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 2010; 74:1018–1027 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Jeong HI, Jin HM, Jeon CO. Complete genome sequence of Sphingorhabdus sp. M41, a versatile hydrocarbon degrader, isolated from crude oil-contaminated costal sediment. J Biotechnol 2016; 227:41–42 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Silva SG, Lago-Lestón A, Costa R, Keller-Costa T. Draft genome sequence of Sphingorhabdus sp. strain EL138, a metabolically versatile Alphaproteobacterium isolated from the gorgonian coral Eunicella labiata . Genome Announc 2018; 6:e0014200118 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Kim HS, Cha SH, Suk HY, Park NH, Woo JH. Complete genome sequence of Sphingorhabdus sp. YGSMI21, exhibiting high enantioselective epoxide hydrolase activity. Genome Announc 2018; 6:e0144101417 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Hiraishi A, Ueda Y, Ishihara J, Mori T. Comparative lipoquinone analysis of influent sewage and activated sludge by high-performance liquid chromatography and photodiode array detection. J Gen Appl Microbiol 1996; 42:457–469 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Sasser M. Identification of bacteria by gas chromatography of cellular fatty acids; 1990
  26. Minnikin DE, O'Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods 1984; 2:233–241 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Chen H, Piao AL, Tan X, Nogi Y, Yeo J et al. Sphingorhabdus buctiana sp. nov., isolated from fresh water, and reclassification of Sphingopyxis contaminans as Sphingorhabdus contaminans comb. nov. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2018; 111:323–331 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Baik KS, Choe HN, Park SC, Hwang YM, Kim EM et al. Sphingopyxis rigui sp. nov. and Sphingopyxis wooponensis sp. nov., isolated from wetland freshwater, and emended description of the genus Sphingopyxis . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:1297–1303 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003503
Loading
Sphingorhabdus pulchriflava sp. nov., isolated from a river
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 69, 2644 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.003503
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003503
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003503
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary File 1

PDF

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error